What's the point of the thread? Are we debating the usefulness of superweapons, what defines a superweapon, what were superweapons...? In my personal opinion, I have grown tired of superweapons and there ever-present "evil" throughout Star Wars continuity. It seems every time the writers can't come up with where another bad-guy-Jedi-not-Sith could have been hiding this whole time or another from-the-galaxy-but-not-really-more-of-from-right-outside-the-galaxy aliens invade, they come up with a stupid superweapon. Okay, in ANH, I get it--good guys versus bad guys, bad guys have huge destructive force (Death Star), good guys have to destroy--got it. Death Star in A New Hope represented the total evil of the Empire as a supplement for showing a galaxy-wide evil. In other words, Lucas used Death Star as the ultimate bad-guy-weapon to show how truly evil the Empire was without going around the galaxy showing all the little evils that add up into a big evil (not to mention he didn't have the budget). But Death Star II? Ergh...okay. Classical trilogy, so it's more-or-less excusable. But wait! Another trench-style run?! Right, right, inside Death Star II, but what the hell? Two proton torpedos and a few laser shots? Dammit, it takes more than that to destroy a mere Star Destroyer!!! But fine, I get it. Lucas is trying to say the Empire is SO evil, they not only wanted to build a second Death Star, but had the means to do so. Wait, what?! Sun Crusher. Eclipse. Eclipse II. Galaxy Gun. Darksaber. Centerpoint Station. Jedi trainees who can throw an entire fleet of Star Destroyers across a star system. A stereotypical Corellian ex-cop turned fighter pilot, turned Jedi, turned good father, turned best friends with high-ranking government officials, turned rogue, turned... COME ON, ALREADY! It's stupid and boring! No more superweapons, whether it be in the literal sense or in the Stackpole bad-writing sense (esp. Corran Horn)! NO MORE SUPERWEAPONS!