Zo my gosh? No, we've been having a discussion on superweapons. So basic requirements for superweapon status seems to be anything that can cause more damage/destruction than conventional weapons? Okay, the point seems rather moot, though, when you consider the sheer amount of superweapons available throughout Star Wars continuity. Further, we have to come up with something a bit more specific. For instance, the Death Stars were clearly superweapons, as were the Eclipses and the Galaxy Gun, but what about the near-superweapons? It seems we've decided Eye of Palpatine does not count since it's primary mission only involved a single objective and rather than using sheer force via firepower, it uses massive amounts of ground troops. Understood, but does that mean a superweapon has to include sheer firepower? For instance, what about the World Devastators? It seems that most consider them superweapons, but at what limit or to what extent? So the question remains: what defines a superweapon as such, and how do we categorize them? Oh, and the whole Jedi 'superweapon' thing, that was a sarcastic remark regarding Corran Horn's apparent invincibility and my distaste for Stackpole's writing... I didn't truly mean that Jedi should be categorized as superweapons.