Nevets

I think we can agree to disagree that no one really has official names for these and Petro can call them whatever they want because they are probably as lost as we are.

I think he meant accusor.

but they do respawn for every other battle, which is what I meant.

Problem I see with that is when you have equal forces, strategy should decide the fate of the battle not respawnable heroes. Heroes should be an ace in the hole, not a constant on the battlefield.

Yea I do wonder why Petro thinks heroes being respawnable is "fun" That would probably shine a light on this subject.

Maybe someone who isn't on right now has a question on heroes being immortal? Keeping this open would prevent 50 "heroes can't die thread????". But yea it will probably close now that you ruined it.

Delphi:

If a thread isn't being discussed anymore it will sink to the bottom and not be a problem anymore. And if new information comes about then we can start the discussion back up in this thread.

Because even devs have called ships such as home one "hero ships"....

uh no, it is still an active topic with discussions and questions still being asked. You really need to learn forum etiquette.

LOL!! ooh burn, by the way why does everyone hate jarjar? Don't answer that back on topic. I voted for twi'leiks in this poll i made! Don't care so much if a thread goes a little off topic, it is a forum, those types of things are natural. Look up the "Evolution of Threads 101".* If you look at any multipage thread, usually a little bit before the third page any thread will have gone a little off topic once. *there is no actual book called this, but their should be.

You know, after them showing the Darth Vader cutscene in the trailer, maybe the game is as open ended as we hoped. Maybe you can change star wars history but not that much. Perhaps heros can't die because they need to be in cutscences later on in the game (can't have darth vader in a cutsceneif he is dead). I hope this isn't the case, I hope it is more open ended than story driven.

Haha yea, it is almost better now to just build yourself a nice desktop, than buy one of these new systems.

Delphi: So it doesn't sound like it will be an ingame option but the ability sounds like it will be there.

*Leia mourning Lukes death from being on a planet destroyed by death star* *Luke pops in* Luke: Hey Leia! Leia: I thought you were dead! Luke: Nope, perfectly fine Leia: How did that happen? Luke: Respawned. Leia: Oh..... .... Luke: Wanna Make out?

As posted in another thread, this is an RTS not a MMORPG, if you get attached to a hero and he dies so what? Ideally you are going to play the game more times than once, so you can restart the game and get your hero back. If you lose your hero in game and he dies you can learn from your mistakes and be more careful next time, this adds strategy on how you use your units. you shouldn't throw a fit about losing your "favorite character", he is only one new game away, you don't lose him forever.

I think it has to do with discussing the game. It has to do with LECs release of info there has been enough discussing of the game in the thread to warrent in being in general discussion I think.

I'm just saying, I hope this will be a good game, the game I have been waiting for (Rebellion was that when it first came out). I just have learned not to think it is a great game before I play it. SWG had all signs pointing towards it being a great game, but slowy but surely they started sneaking in little bits of disapointing info. That being said, I have more hope for Petro than I do SOE.

True, but this is an RTS not a MMORPG, if a hero dies ah well, you learned from it. You can restart the game or finish it and your hero is back and you can play him again. If it was a MMORPG you become attached to the character and need it to respawn it everytime it dies. EDIT: don't mean for this to turn into another heros dying thread.

saying it is a great game and not playing it is almost as bad as saying a game sucks that is still in development.

Would hate to be there once someone official annouces: -ANH timeline -No SSD -Popcap -Heroes can't die. ouch it will a bunch of people "tHis GaME SuxS!!!!!" all over the place.

some one is asking if this: http://www.wizards.com/swminis/images/rots/4_AT-RT.jpg which was in EPIII. He uses BFII as an example of a game it is in, is in the game. Everyone tells him there are no clone wars vehicles in the game which we know is false.

Still people on there that think the timeline ends at endor and the Ven is not in. http://forums.lucasarts.com/thread.jspa?threadID=91012&tstart=0 I still say that Lucasarts has been misleading when previewing this game about the timeline.

Or Bothans? The best spies in the galaxy

can you prove that? Lucas pland 9 movies all toget her, wht makes you think he never wrote out the ideas for the last 3? anyways if you want to look at it here is the site, ill stop talking now. http://www.supershadow.com/starwars/episode7/plot.html http://www.supershadow.com/starwars/episode8/plot.html http://www.supershadow.com/starwars/episode9/plot.html Last post on this: Have you ever watch EPI-EPIII you can tell he never wrote out the prequels scripts when he wrote the original trilogy. Not saying he had some ideas, he just never wrote them out as full scripts. Edit: also the scripts for the prequels are way off on there.