Jump to content

TSKNF

Members
  • Posts

    443
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never

Everything posted by TSKNF

  1. Say, what purpose did the TIE scout serve on the rugular map? And someone answer my buidling question in my other topic.
  2. How many more pics are there to be posted?
  3. This is 2005 Fosh we have anti-cheating measures now. Oh man, Imagine Cain's face when he realises what he's missing
  4. You don't have to use them fosh.
  5. Was it from the space view or did you see them built on-map?
  6. Haha, wait till Siddus and Darkmark see's they were late to report this!
  7. So where are the ground battle pics? EDIT: oh oh here they are this is a gold mine
  8. Right-so in th enew shoots, we see it was none of those things after all.
  9. That has already been confirmed in another thread.
  10. Tartan? Och Aye Laddie.
  11. Also note in the middle of a battle it has a selection of units you can train.
  12. Nice.....I'm not sure about the look of the Mon cal, the colour-coding makes it look like it's been splashed with paint.
  13. Make a new topic for it though. OR DIE.
  14. Be free to add away. Mugglenet's wall of shame! HP-haters should read it too. I feel for every poster on this page. I never want to go to Japan.
  15. Or else *points to a guillotine*
  16. Uh? Oh I mean the SSD is a candidate. But someone posted that a hero Imp ship was the 'Accuser'-has someone spelled Exector wrong? Here's hoping
  17. Huh, so two new units in two days, not a bad deal. As well as the SSD, the GC threads also mention: -Kyle Katranns ship so there's one possibility -A smaller version of the ISD (the Aegis-class possibly?) so there's some other candidates, along with the interceptor and the b-wing.
  18. Don't we all look at things from the imp point of view.
  19. Just something that bugged me and I forgot to ask, those who played the Games conference demo, how are air units like the airspeeder controlled on ground maps? I mean, do they hover when stationary or do laps?
  20. I wonder which units that refers to? the z-95 headhunter->x-wing perhaps?
  21. *hits him* I doubt that. No ships in the SW universe were a straight-forward upgrade of an old class-they were normally new ships to take new strategic positions. The TIE interceptor was used beside the TIE fighter since it was designed for a different strategic role.
  22. I have a feeling this 'new unit' will infact be the Pod walker that was shown by Little.B's website. A force-feeling, in fact....
  23. Now let us all take the same side and laugh shamelessly at the liberator-ists.
  24. Check out Little.B's website. I am now royally pissed for the first time with this game. IT IS SO OBVIOUSLY A DEMOLISHER!
  25. Wait...so that ship that we argued over the name of, was not the liberator, the decimator, or the Demolisher SD? It was a 'broadside cruiser'? I gonna rip somebody a new one....

Copyright (c) 1999-2025 by SWRebellion Community - All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters. Star Wars(TM) is a registered trademark of LucasFilm, Ltd. We are not affiliated with LucasFilm or Walt Disney. This is a fan site and online gaming community (non-profit). Powered by Invision Community

×
×
  • Create New...