[Poll] Do you enjoy playing Rebellion versus Person/Comp?

[Guest Admiral_Antilles]

I just thought I would take a polll to see what everyone thought on the subject.

[Bill]

I always kick the computers butt.

[Guest Scathane]

I just couldn't resist that last answer!

 

The point is that I've never played a human opponent, so I wouldn't know how it is... I would very much like to, however!

[SOCL]

I think you're going to find that such responses such as your last selection are irresistible. I responded such because I could not resist and because I don't care which I play against and my desire to play Rebellion is not so much that I must choose the third selection for the poll response.

[Guest Scathane]

I think you're going to find that such responses such as your last selection are irresistible. I responded such because I could not resist and because I don't care which I play against and my desire to play Rebellion is not so much that I must choose the third selection for the poll response.

Moreover, polls such as these (or indeed any poll) invoke the BE part of the Grand Imperator of BEAK, as his last post clearly demonstrated...

[dude21]

Playing with the AI is very lame!! And I dont play against comp anymore.

[Lord_La_forge]

Agains human players of course. I just can't play without a prisoner exchange anymore We usually start with cease-fire for some hundred days, than attacing each others planets...

[dude21]

we dont make cease fire but we dont make civilian or general bombardment (Genfer Ground - War - Convention) and so everyone has many maintanance for huge fleets

[Guest Admiral_Antilles]

Which person besides ol scath picked the last answer! TELL ME! I must destroy him! MUHAHAHAHAHAHA. Oh sorry about that guys.

[SOCL]

Which person besides ol scath picked the last answer! TELL ME! I must destroy him! MUHAHAHAHAHAHA. Oh sorry about that guys.

I did.

 

Cease fires, never thought of that. Idealy we would have some initial fighting, sign a cease fire and treaty (not peace treaty, just treaty) that would include no blowing up of planets (if that had already happened) and no civilian and general bombardment, and the like. You know, kind of like the Geneva Convention.

[Guest Admiral_Antilles]

Why?

[SOCL]

Why?

It makes the game more interesting and last longer.

[dude21]

Thanks for assistance SOCL u are fully right

[SOCL]

Thanks for assistance SOCL u are fully right

Any time, bro!

[dude21]

We had games were we bombarded many sectors down to ash with no energy there so NOTHING can rebuild there and everyone has just one sector with buildings and a very wimpy fleet with generals, admirals, commanders each planet and ship and so that was a bad game

Since that time we began to make rules.

[ElvisMiggell]

Never had an opportunity to play against a human, so i guess i have to settle for the pc ai, though not 'ALL THE WAY!!!'.

[SOCL]

We had games were we bombarded many sectors down to ash with no energy there so NOTHING can rebuild there and everyone has just one sector

That must have been a very interesting game, but having only two good sectors would be pretty stupid. I would understand if you have two unusable sectors, but the practically the whole galaxy was useless...jeez!

[Grand_Admiral_Thrawn]

I prefer to play against humans. The computer is predictable in its tactics, both in its selection of planets to attack and its combat simulation abilities. People tend to stratagise. Also, there tend to be less small battle against humans. Both sides build up several large fleets and duke it out. But the computer is decent.

[SOCL]

I prefer to play against humans. The computer is predictable in its tactics, both in its selection of planets to attack and its combat simulation abilities. People tend to stratagise. Also, there tend to be less small battle against humans. Both sides build up several large fleets and duke it out. But the computer is decent.

Exact same reason I like a human opponent. I can never seem to find an ALL-OUT HUGE fleet engagement against the computer, which I would LOVE to do!

[dude21]

We had games were we bombarded many sectors down to ash with no energy there so NOTHING can rebuild there and everyone has just one sector

That must have been a very interesting game, but having only two good sectors would be pretty stupid. I would understand if you have two unusable sectors, but the practically the whole galaxy was useless...jeez!

 

I was the Imperial and it starts that I lost a very huge fleet compleetly because of many cc7700 Frigats After that I get phrenetical and starts with my Deathstar and a big fleet to destroy the enemy systems

He does the same with my sectors. And at the end I had remaining the Sesswena Sector and he had the rim sector with his HQ I think it was that one below where Yavin is and there I lost my Deathstar

We acepted a draw

[ElvisMiggell]

Did you both have deathstars??? Is it possible to play as Imp vs Imp?!?

[dude21]

No just I had a deathstar but he bombards all down to ash to no free energy slots.

[SOCL]

Is it possible to play as Imp vs Imp?!?

That would be fun, like the warlords fighting each other in Darksaber. Maybe a patch or download could be made to make this possible....

[Lord_La_forge]

I don't think it's possible. The game is hardcoded a very special way with each side very unique. I only can think of replacing all cards and models for the rebs (and music( I've done that, if anyone interested), sounds, backgrounds, droids). But you will still have a hidden Hq, witch you must defend, the millenium falcon effect, the heritage event and so on. Huge project it would be....

[Grand_Admiral_Thrawn]

Another problem is that only one side can have a Death Star. I tried giving it to the Rebels once and the Imperials still had contol over it in the battles but the rebels paid for it , a good tactic against a friend if you don't tell them