Jump to content

Nevets

Members
  • Posts

    1,109
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Nevets

  1. Oh really? Heh, why would the Empire have the need for the Lancer Frigate then after the battle of Yavin if the Tartan Patrol Cruiser did so well? Something is amiss here. Unfortunately I doubt they think or care that far into it But I agree, they should have just included the lancer, even if it is off the timeline, it isn't anymore than the a-wing.
  2. 1 2B 4 21 22
  3. As said in the other thread, kessel looks fantastic. The hutts tho just look out of place. Shouldn't they have hired other species (weequays, tei'leks, Gamorrean) fighting for them?
  4. Why is the rancor still on Tatooine?
  5. Never finished the hk story? the hardly started it Also the whole Gangleader probed droid thing hardly made any sense. The sith lords were also way underdeveloped. I'm sorry if I have been sounding negative towards lucasarts lately about EAW, but following SWG, KOTOR 2, and Battlefront from start to finish will make you strongly question any game they produce.
  6. Shouldn't this be moved to the gaming forum? (I would do it, but since Fosh already did moved it I don't want to offend him)
  7. Yea but you would have thought they would have added to it with the longer development time they had
  8. What I don't understand about units is that Star Wars sets up the perfect tech tree in order to have a lot of ships and have them balanced, but it doesn't seemed to be used in this game. I thought this was going to be how it was with Delphi orginally saying how the Ven would be "Old tech". If they did it this way the game would allow to have many moire ships and keep it balanced: Venator-ISD-ISD II Acclamator(assuming it is a light frigate like they said)-Victory-Victory II Tie-Interceptor-Defender Patrol Crusier-Carrak Assualt Frigate MkI-Assualt Frigate MkII z-95-x-wing-updated x-wing y-wing-b-wing-updated b-wing The ships would basically do the same thing, but be a little better. I would hope you wuld still be able to keep the old units tho for a cheaper price. I hate games that updated all the old stuff automatically, I like my vintage stuff.
  9. I must say, Kessel looks very good. It is the planet I am so far most impressed with. Looks very much how I would imagine kessel. the hutts tho:
  10. It is still EAW feedback tho, LEC or Petro.
  11. Can we have a complaint forum here? I don't agree that those threads should have been deleted or moved to the slag. Make a new feedback forum or LEC forum. A feedback forum where we can complain all we want and not have to worry about someone complaining about "negativity".
  12. Pretty much Rebellion 2 (See the Expansion thread for a lot of good ideas.)
  13. Yes... I can imagine the developer meeting: A: "Hey. Lets create a game, whichs development process will cost thousands of dollars but which in the end only attracts a small amount of people!" B: "...." Right! It is for everybody! This game is also made for people that love to play RTS games and not only for those that now the exact numer of the SSD turbolasers, the length of C3-POs right arm and the color of Lukes underwear when fighting Vader in episode 5... All succesfull RTS out there could also have more units. But why havent they all more then 100 units? Because there is no need for it. If you want to create a game that is fun to play and not to complex (so that it is easy to learn) you have to take away content. Every game starts with more content and gets rid off a lot of content in the development process. If they would have never told about the Venetor you wouldn't miss it. I promiss. The only thing you are pissed off is that it was in before and has been taken out. You are majorly wrong here star wars fans do not attract "a small group of people" If anything we are one of the largest groups of gaming fans out there (with the exception of maybe sports fans), that is how LEC can come out with a subpar game like Battlefronts and have it sell millions of copies. That is why evey moddable game out there has a Star Wars Mod. Star Wars games are primarily made for star wars fans that is its directed audience. Battlefront is not nearly the best shooter out there, you don't play it for an FPS, you play it because you want to participate in star wars battles. Like wise EAW will probably not be the best RTS out there, it will attract the most people because they want to rule the star wars galaxy, not play just another RTS. (The only star games that I can think of that were the top of their genre are the Tie and x-wing games and KOTOR, most Star wars games have been rip offs of other popular games with a star wars, further proof that star wars games are made for star wars fans). Also about the whol balancing thing. How could it have been unbalanced if both sides got the same ship?!?!?!
  14. Case in point: Star wars galaxies failed becuase it didn't have enough complexity. -Rebellion was very complex and people are still playing it. It is probably what LEC will jump behind as well as the fanbois. But LEC is more about getting money then worrying about game balance.
  15. maybe, because it hasn't had time to be written in EU, give it time its popularity will get it in there. And a lot of stuff is in this game that isn't in the OT, Acclamator, Pod Walker, other clone wars stuff...
  16. This is my thoughts exactly. I don't mind new stuff (infact I use to defended it when I thought they were going to have the established stuff), but I wanted to actually see the star wars stuff first.
  17. I want a Star Wars game, meaning ships from the movies or from well known EU ships. If you are new to the subject there are different levels of canon or things held true to star wars fans. over the past 25 some years a lot of ships have been made up in star wars EU, this is true. But there are so many ships available to make there is absolutlely no need to create new ships anymore. Yup so I guess I am an idiot for wanting a ship from the star wars movies (the reason I am buying the game) over something the developers made up. Also with the release date being pushed back they are a little bit behind scehdule. So when they decided to axe the Venator at some point they would have had to take time out to do this. It might have been simply hightlight delete, or something more complicated. Either way they needed to take time out of working on the game to take something out they already spent some time making. This time spent in this process could be a reason (while not directly) why it was pushed back.
  18. Its not just this forum it is every forum. We can't just have happy all the time, you have to be able to question games sometimes. Maybe if they see enough of us our upset some changes will be made. If you can't handle a bit of negativity then maybe forums aren't cut out for you.
  19. He was the community rep, basically a yes man that was forced to give out false info.
  20. I still can't believe they are calling it an upset
  21. To bad that goes the way of online petitions usually. Just can't believe they see how excited a community gets over one ship so they save it for an expansion.
  22. Nevets

    GameStar Preview

    I must have missed this scene in the movie....
  23. Real ships in before made up unstarwarsy crap.
  24. Its Star Wars Galaxies all over again! Even Delphi is starting to sound like Thunderheart
  25. I was expecting a lot more, but lucasarts some how manages to s crew up a game....again (surprise suprise). Instead of making a soild game they are making half a game.

Copyright (c) 1999-2025 by SWRebellion Community - All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters. Star Wars(TM) is a registered trademark of LucasFilm, Ltd. We are not affiliated with LucasFilm or Walt Disney. This is a fan site and online gaming community (non-profit). Powered by Invision Community

×
×
  • Create New...