JanGaarni

Well, i have multiple. Ships and Music.

Uuu, what happened to me text?!? EDIT: Ok, there we go. Thank you so very much, Teradyn, for quoting me in my entirety. Saved me alot of re-typing there. EDIT2: By the way, if what you say is something you have read, then I need to research this, cause nowhere can I remember Acbar uttering these words. I'll get back on that one.

Delphi, if what you say is true, then I think an explaination on this is in order. If I'm not misstaken, that is an ISD mkII (as seen in ESB and RotJ) and the guns that are selected are the turrets on the left side of the superstructure, and if so, then all of those guns are supposed to be Heavy Turbolaser batteries, not Ion Cannon batteries. Ways that makes me believe it is an ISD mkII are the turret batteries in question appear to have 8 barrels on each battery (4 barrels on each turret, think WWII battleships for visual reference, so 4 barrels per turret, 2 turrets per battery which again acts as a turret, and 4 batteries per side of the superstructure, totalling to 64 guns/barrels)), and the horizontal array between the domes rather than the upright on the ISD mkI seen in ANH, and no brim trench heavy gun batteries which the mkI has. And even if it is an ISD mkI, then only the rear most turret is a Heavy Ion Cannon. The mkI has 3 dual barreled Heavy Turbolaser turrets per side of the superstructure, and 1 dual barreled Heavy Ion Cannons at the rear, totalling to 12 HTL guns and 4 HIC guns. They are of a heavier caliber than on the ISD mkII though. I'll try finding pictures of the turrets.

I think, since the "snow" speeders where ment to be used in atmospheric enviroment, they weren't built to withstand colds that could be experienced in space for instance. That is why X-Wings and other space ships arn't as effected by Hoths relatively mild climate compared to space. And shield generators are protected by the shield themselfs aswell. There's no questioning this. The only sources stating otherwise are games, for 1 obvious reason: So that a single person is able to take out the biggest ships in a given game. But personally, I feel in an RTS there is no need for this philosophy, as we all know, that you can use shields that you are able to walk thru, but not fire thru them. I think this would be far more realistic and more fun to try and get those shields down.

Jan you are correct. The Neb-Bs were new when a whole fleet of them defected to the Alliance. After that the Empire created the Modified Nebulon Frigates. More powerfull, better weapons, shields and Armor . It is little things like this that would make for great storyline tags for each ship in the game and make it more realistic that will probably not be in. The Nebulon frigates will probably be the same on each side. Yeah, I agree, that would be good for a mission.

I hope our (LucasForums) questions are coming back aswell soon, Delphi.

Looks like me 10-15 years ago when I lost.

Well, the "Will the SSD be in?" question is definatly out.

It's a good saying ...... though the wordings arn't exactly the way I remembered them.

Evaders, if you could give any word when Mask (or if Mask) gets around to having fixed the Executor, it'd be much appreciated.

Or go nuts on the keyboard. *looks at Swifts avatar*

You mean the program resource hacker itself? EDIT: Ah, now I see. So basically, the Rebellion Model Importer isn't really complete unless you link it with Resource Hacker. Thanks, now I understood what they ment.

You mean in EaW2? Not likely. I heard rumors it's going to take place more arond the Clone Wars period.

Sorry, I didn't mean to poke.

No, let's discuss this right here right now. Come on, let's start it, come on. >_> <_< Yeah, ok then.

Yes. You just wrote that to agrivate me, didn't you.

Yes, the Executor-Class Star De ..... errr, wait, nevermind.

Okay, one more time. TIE/ in = Interceptor TIE/ ln = Front Line Fighter I've put spaces in after the / just so it is easier to see the I and L

Yes, I realise you may have seen this written with capital letters (hell even StarWars.Com writes some models with a capital letter and some with lowercase letters, why shouldn't others also get it wrong. ), but the propper typing is lowercase. My reply was mostly towards Stellar_Magic. All I'm saying is that I've met many people (not saying anyone here, don't get me wrong) have been misstaking the TIE/ln to mean the TIE Interceptor, when in fact it is the standard TIE Fighter we saw in all the Original Trilogy movies. It's ment to be informative, not to start up a debated and hijack this thread.

Well, it hasn't finished loading yet, but I have a nagging feeling this is an old trailer.

The Nebulon-B frigates was pretty new when they were stolen if memory serves me right. Of course, my memory is like a swiss cheese so.

Isn't the V-Wing from EU technically an airspeeder, not a fighter?

I'll note down the questions for you, Youki.

I don't think the Acclamator is considered as an SD, much the same way the 418-Immobiliser isn't an SD. It may be a wedge shaped ship, but having a wedgeshaped hull doesn't automatically make an SD. THe 418 even looks pretty much like an SD, and it isn't even classified as an SD.

Small note: It's written TIE/in, lowercase letters. It stands for Interceptor. The normal TIE's you see in the movies is designated TIE/ln (LN). Many people get confused by this, which isn't surprising since a capital I looks almost exactly the same as a lowercase l at first glance.