Jump to content

ISD's vs VSDs vs Mon Cals


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 184
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

The Sith Infiltraitor was cool looking, but we really don't know what it's capabilities are. We don't even know if it had shields. It can't have been too good in any case, because it dissapeared in the later movies (unless GL plans on replacing Vader's x1 with the infiltraitor)

History is on the move, Captain. Those who cannot keep up with it will be left behind, to watch from a distance. And those who stand in our way will not watch at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

GL cant replace Vaders x1 with an infiltraitor. the Infiltraitor was a much larger vessel that any TIE fighter.
I once knew a great man. Nothing got to him, and he always smiled. May he forever rest in peace, knowing fully well that his freinds shall remember him.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

But that doesn't mean he can't replace the x1 with it. If he's going to be changing the Battle of Yavin around and adding more CG fighters, anything is possible.

 

I suggest we let this topic rest for a while. I'd value the input of Fishy, Darkie, Mad..ie and others who aren't here right now. Oh, and Trejie too. :lol:

History is on the move, Captain. Those who cannot keep up with it will be left behind, to watch from a distance. And those who stand in our way will not watch at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey, if they want to be losers and not be on the site 24/7, thats fine by me.

 

Us 1337 players though, we can continue this conversation all night long.

I once knew a great man. Nothing got to him, and he always smiled. May he forever rest in peace, knowing fully well that his freinds shall remember him.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey, if they want to be losers and not be on the site 24/7, thats fine by me.

 

I was responding to that.

Sorry, should have made that more clear.

Aww, this is not my time for humour. I should just leave it, right?

 

...losers...hmph.

 

Now where were we?

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v436/RiesstiuIV/Krempel/trapaure.gif
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Sith Infiltraitor was cool looking, but we really don't know what it's capabilities are. We don't even know if it had shields. It can't have been too good in any case, because it dissapeared in the later movies (unless GL plans on replacing Vader's x1 with the infiltraitor)

 

Good point. We are writing 2004, and GL has to produce some cool looking, HUGE, or strong ships to impress the crowd. But if we think about the timeline, it could be, that the infiltrator is not much better as a simple TIE Fighter. SW timeline is a bit hard to manage however. Just think about Kotor. I think it was 20-30 thousand years before ANH. Still, there were TIE like ships with laser cannons... and a ship looking like the Mill. Falcon... Perhaps we just leave Kotor out of sight :roll:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Infiltrator is much bigger than a TIE, you could label it as a shuttle or light transport rather than a starfighter.

As for that game, which I haven't play, well... we know how imaginative game designer can be. :roll:

http://www.swrebellion.com/~jahled/Trej/banner.gif
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stealth, no cloaking. Except for the Thrawn trillogy, ther eare no cloaking devices in Star Wars. I think it is more of a glorified shuttle, since it too big to be a fighter.

History is on the move, Captain. Those who cannot keep up with it will be left behind, to watch from a distance. And those who stand in our way will not watch at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the TPM novelizations it states that is possess a cloaking device. And there are other vehicles with cloaking devices, remember that comment made by Captain Needa during ESB?
http://www.swrebellion.com/~jahled/Trej/banner.gif
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, but remember that the Empire did have access to cloaking devices because of what was stored in Mount Tantis. However, you would have to be privy to that information (like the captain of a Star Destroyer in Death Squadron) to know about it. What needa says directly contradicts anything in the TPM novels. "No ship that size could have a cloaking device". You could take it that no ship that big could have a cloaking device, butsince the Falcon isn't that big, you must assume he meant no ship that small could have a cloading device.

History is on the move, Captain. Those who cannot keep up with it will be left behind, to watch from a distance. And those who stand in our way will not watch at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Or the contrary, cloaking devices could be meant to be for starfighters, and a ship of that size could be too big for a cloakind device, only Lucas know. (Let's ignore TIE Fighter, because we all know how LEC invents stuff to break continuity).
http://www.swrebellion.com/~jahled/Trej/banner.gif
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is possible, but he does say cloaking device. WHo knows, there are lots of contradictory statements in the movies that make it very difficult for fans to figure out what the hell is the truth.

History is on the move, Captain. Those who cannot keep up with it will be left behind, to watch from a distance. And those who stand in our way will not watch at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


Copyright (c) 1999-2022 by SWRebellion Community - All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters. Star Wars(TM) is a registered trademark of LucasFilm, Ltd. We are not affiliated with LucasFilm or Walt Disney. This is a fan site and online gaming community (non-profit). Powered by Invision Community

×
×
  • Create New...