MerLock

Do you feel the game was rushed and too many bugs were left in during release? Maybe pple thought the game should've came out sooner and pple said they were no longer getting the game coz of the delay from the original ship date. Pple felt releasing it earlier would've help this game. So what's your opinion now?

Thx for your response. Much love to you.

^ Well the 44 galatic conquest thing is for 2 players only I think. So if you want to play with all 5 of your friends at the sametime then you would have to play the squirmish mode. Unless you want to start a conquest game with each of them and play each 1vs1. Play counter strike. It's cheap and great fun for everyone! I was wondering if it's not 44 planets in galatic conquest mode, how many planets can you play right now or is the whole idea of playing a friend in conquest mode hasn't even been added yet?

So on galatic mode with a friend, how many planets do you get to play?

I thought it was mentioned already awhile back that there was no 2 player campaign? So, it's not really a suprise, unless you mean there is no 2 player galatic conquest play involving 44 planets.

Your playing a demo with mods I presume? So are you suggestions/complaints made towards the modders or the game designers? I think the designers lowered the comp ai and the mods may have introduced some bugs to the game since the game prob. didn't have everything playable yet.

I prefer not to have to worry about diplomacy and revolts. Enough to worry about as there is with just trying to conquering the galaxy.

I don't know how their ranking system works for games that haven't been released yet, but I often find their reviews to be pretty good once the games do come out. They go into dept about both the pros and cons of a game. I think the ranking system for games that haven't been released yet, is more of what game is most anticipated and they may setup their ranks by the number of clicks a game gets. EAW was ahead since a demo was released and that caused a lot of pple to click on EAW while BFMEII demo was just released yesterday causing a lot of clicks there. Just a guess.

Wow you can win the game of the month award even though Feb. isn't over yet and with a score of just 8.3?

I think they intend for us to only move troops into areas where we control the reinforcement points. If we can just put troops anywhere during battle, then that just does away with the whole idea of reinforcement points.

The Nina, The Pinta and the Santa Maria fir the ISD's.

I think the cool thing about Rome total war was the friendly fire but i guess EAW doesn't want it in the game because it does add to micromanagement. Starcraft had it as well. Always nice seeing your Terran tank blowing up your own troops.

I understand the two mp modes , just got confused by the Q & A. Just wanted to make sure that I can select the AI as the opponents in skirmish mode. Or is it pure real player vs real players?

So is there co-op play against the AI in skirmish mode or is it purely player vs player?

The Death Star named to - This is 4 the win! Luke's Squadron named to - All your bases r belong to us.

All you have to do to prevent backstabbing is that the game creator can have an option that allows him to setup a game where the alliance factions can't be changed once the game has started. So everyone would choose who is on whose teams from the get go and once the creator hits the start button, it's all locked in. I just want to know if me and my freinds can play against the AI in skirmish mode.

So no co-op play what so ever? Not even in skirmish mode, like several pple versus the AI?

I like the game the way it is. What made starcraft so great was its balance and simplicity. No need to repair and no diplomacy. Just go in and have a good skirmish game is where it's at.

I'm new to all this stuff. Can someone explain to me what's the purpose of a frigate?

I think it depends on the player. Some pple don't like having to keep track of what needs to be repaired and what doesn't. So to some, this is a blessing. If it was turn based, then I would agree, repairs would be cool coz you have the time to look around and see what needs to be repaired and such but with it being an RTS, I think it'll cost too much time to see which units need to be repaired and pull them out of harms way.

It should since as mentioned before, the only requirement for the fleet and troops to be repaired is that a battle is over. Either by victory or retreat. But again, it's just the demo and I could be wrong. They could've just sped up everything (building,repairing) just coz it's a demo.

I don't think damage was ever said to be persistent. Someone brought up the question about the need for repair before and it was stated from the developers before that there was no need for manuel repairs after a battle because once a battle was over everything gets repaired. It's the troops that are persistent. For example, in star craft you have to build your army EVERY single time you play. Every battle would start from scratch. But as we can see from the galatic conquest map, Star Wars perserves your remaining troops after a battle. They are carried over from one battle to the next or can be re-deployed else where. That is what they meant by persistance. The troops and equipment are persistance but not the damage taken.

I found a bug in the tutorial where you are suppose to send in the rebellion blockade runners through the imperial blockade. However, I accidently chose the wrong units (ground units in transports) and moved them to the blockaded planet. Since it was the wrong units they were detected by the imperial forces and it said, space battle imminent and took me to the loading screen. However, the space battle never started and it just stayed on that loading screen even after I clicked the "Begin" button. I had to shut down the game and start over because nothing I did got me out of that screen.

Demo should include both.

They were recycled to provide affordable housing for the lower class and the rest were converted into tv dinner trays.