Jump to content
  • 0

Katanna Fleet (Dark Force)


Question

Posted

Has anyone other than myself actually ever attempted to build the ~200 Dreadnaught Katanna fleet? I have actually done it before and it is GREAT! Imagine 200 Dreadnaughts suddenly appearing in orbit over your system and take out your fleet within seconds, then bomb the hell out of your planet! foaming at mouth . . .

 

It's great to be an Imperial. :D

  • Answers 255
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
Posted
And who is the Dude King? Dude number 21? :wink:

I remember, the Dude Cubes were very vulnerable in the beginning ( In the "Locutus the Dude" period). But Dudez are out of trend now. Nobody is interested in cyborgs anymore. It was a trend of the late '80 and the '90

Dudes are out :lol:

I think ST will not use the Borgs for further movies, episodes.

 

Lord_La_forge locked as primary target he must be assimilated at all costs, his superunique abilities and his supreme intellect must be added to my own.

 

Lord_La_forge prepare to be assimilated lower ur shields resistance is futile.

 

Lord_La_forge now u r part of the collective your job is to clean my ass.

  • 0
Posted

Scat? no no no u r all wrong. Scat stands for Scatman John and

everybody "*sing*scooby dooby dootndat da da da" knows that Scatman John is about 50 years.

  • 0
Posted

:x Dude22,

:arrow: either you have a bad taste for humour,

:arrow: or you're simply primitive,

:arrow: or drunk every time you post,

I'm not interested to clean your ***. Anyway. It would be a pleasure to kick it all over the place.

  • 0
Posted

:roll:

 

Getting back on topic, when I make the Katana fleet, I load it up with Y-Wings. Theymay be slow, but even the 181st would tremble at the sight of 200+ squads of Y-Wings

Lost a planet Master Obi-Wan has, how embarrassing. - Yoda

 

Do not count a human dead until you've seen his body, and even then you can make a mistake. - Bene Gesserit saying

  • 0
Posted
Why not fill up with A-wings Wormie? so u have a good fighter cover and strong warship Firepower :wink:
"I am growing stronger with the Force"
  • 0
Posted
I fill it up with Y-wings to be more historically accurate. When the Katana fleet was first made, none of the current fighter squadrons existed, but since the Y-Wing is the oldest fighter I use that.

Lost a planet Master Obi-Wan has, how embarrassing. - Yoda

 

Do not count a human dead until you've seen his body, and even then you can make a mistake. - Bene Gesserit saying

  • 0
Posted
I fill it up with Y-wings to be more historically accurate. When the Katana fleet was first made, none of the current fighter squadrons existed, but since the Y-Wing is the oldest fighter I use that.
I figured that was the reason. I used to fill mine up with TIE Fighters, but when I realized I was getting my fighter's butts wooped, I refitted it with TIE Defenders . . . and now. . . . :twisted:
  • 0
Posted
I fill it up with Y-wings to be more historically accurate. When the Katana fleet was first made, none of the current fighter squadrons existed, but since the Y-Wing is the oldest fighter I use that.

 

but so is youre fleet very frail against great Fighter attacks with Interceptors and much Bomber :roll:

 

historical right but...... 8)

"I am growing stronger with the Force"
  • 0
Guest Scathane
Posted
I fill it up with Y-wings to be more historically accurate. When the Katana fleet was first made, none of the current fighter squadrons existed, but since the Y-Wing is the oldest fighter I use that.

 

but so is youre fleet very frail against great Fighter attacks with Interceptors and much Bomber :roll:

 

historical right but...... 8)

Have you ever actually battled a 200 ships large Dreadnaught fleet or are you basing this on experience and estimates, dude21?
  • 0
Posted

Ok lets make math calculation :wink:

 

200 Dreadnoughts: 33 maint * 200 = 6600 maintenance

44 costs * 200 = 8800 costs

200 Y-wings : 4 maint * 200 = 800 maintenance

5 costs * 200 = 1000 costs

----------------------------------------------------------------------

suma sumarum: maintenance: 7400

costs : 9800

 

Oponent :

TIE Bomber : 3 maint, 3 cost each :arrow:

9800 costs :arrow: ca 3000 TIE Bomber

 

We abandon the Fighter Cover :)

 

So scanthane simulate the battle please and tell me results

 

3000 TIE Bomber VS Katana Fleet

"I am growing stronger with the Force"
  • 0
Guest Scathane
Posted
So scanthane simulate the battle please and tell me results

 

3000 TIE Bomber VS Katana Fleet

Duuhh! I understand all that, dude21. But before you huys were talking about 50 X-Wing squadrons... That's quite a difference...
  • 0
Posted

50 X-wing Squads VS. Katana+Fighters? Thats not realistic :?

But perhaps 100 X-Wings VS Katana without Fighters will be very difficult for Katana :wink:

"I am growing stronger with the Force"
  • 0
Posted

 

3000 TIE Bomber VS Katana Fleet

 

To use this as an actual fleet you would also have to build 500 Escort Carriers to carry them though. Whats the resource cost for that? What good is 3000 fighters if they are grounded. You should also build an Intridictor as well so that the Enemy fleet doesn't just run away and stay clear of the planet. 3000 fighters is very intimidating, don't get me wrong, but it's not very mobile.

Lost a planet Master Obi-Wan has, how embarrassing. - Yoda

 

Do not count a human dead until you've seen his body, and even then you can make a mistake. - Bene Gesserit saying

  • 0
Guest Scathane
Posted
To use this as an actual fleet you would also have to build 500 Escort Carriers to carry them though. Whats the resource cost for that? What good is 3000 fighters if they are grounded. You should also build an Intridictor as well so that the Enemy fleet doesn't just run away and stay clear of the planet. 3000 fighters is very intimidating, don't get me wrong, but it's not very mobile.
500 Imp Escort Carriers would cost you 17.000 in construction cost and another 15.000 in maintenance. 8O8O8O
  • 0
Posted

 

3000 TIE Bomber VS Katana Fleet

 

To use this as an actual fleet you would also have to build 500 Escort Carriers to carry them though. Whats the resource cost for that? What good is 3000 fighters if they are grounded. You should also build an Intridictor as well so that the Enemy fleet doesn't just run away and stay clear of the planet. 3000 fighters is very intimidating, don't get me wrong, but it's not very mobile.

 

OK Thats right I understand that point, so look 8)

 

180 Imperial escort carrier :arrow: 1080 TIE Bomber

 

That are costs about 6120 for Carrier and 3240 for Bomber

Suma :arrow: 9360, lesser then Katana

Maint : 8640, more then Katana

 

Result: 1080 TIE Bomber + 180 Carrier VS. Katana Fleet

 

No chance for Katana :roll:

"I am growing stronger with the Force"
  • 0
Guest Scathane
Posted
OK Thats right I understand that point, so look 8)

 

180 Imperial escort carrier :arrow: 1080 TIE Bomber

 

That are costs about 6120 for Carrier and 3240 for Bomber

Suma :arrow: 9360, lesser then Katana

Maint : 8640, more then Katana

Let's do this again:

 

Katanna cost = 9800 (Dreads + Y-wings)

Katanna maintenance = 7400 (Dreads + Y-wings)

---------------------------------------------------------

Total = 17.200

 

1080 Tie + 180 Escort cost = 9360

1080 Tie + 180 Escort maintenace = 8640

---------------------------------------------------------

Total = 18.000 = MORE THAN KATANNA

 

Moreover, I believe that Katanna is an Imp fleet, isn't it?

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now

Copyright (c) 1999-2025 by SWRebellion Community - All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters. Star Wars(TM) is a registered trademark of LucasFilm, Ltd. We are not affiliated with LucasFilm or Walt Disney. This is a fan site and online gaming community (non-profit). Powered by Invision Community

×
×
  • Create New...