February 5, 200620 yr They did it with Lasers Laser cannons on a starfighter are more powerful than on the converted civilian airspeeders.
February 5, 200620 yr the speeders had baster cannons, x-wings have laser Evacuate, in our moment of triumph. I think you overestimate their chances. Please can you post a comment on My clone story, in fan fiction. http://pff.swrebellion.com/index.php?topic=2306.0 (\_/)(O.O)(> <) This is Bunny. Copy Bunny into your signature to help him on his way to world Domination
February 5, 200620 yr theres a difference between blaster cannons and laser cannons, Xwings have laser, Speeders have blaster. Blasters are weaker. http://starwars.wikicities.com/images/thumb/7/73/300px-Imperial_Fleet.jpgLong live the Venator!
February 8, 200620 yr IMO AT-AT's cannot be beaten if thier standing still witha tow cable around them, tahts why its not a garunteed sucess, i think in the game if the AT-AT isnt moving your got 0% of geting the AT-AT down now if its moving thats another thing, apart from that its nearly invunrable most things apart from realy heavy guns etc. I hope its also baised like this in the full version. The Tow cable is primerly a trip cable in how it works with AT-AT'S if the AT-AT dosnt move then he cant trip lol, simple realy. http://miniprofile.xfire.com/bg/bg/type/2/nexeus.png
February 8, 200620 yr That is questionable. If the AT-AT wasn't moving the cable would eventually fall down to the ground like a pair of pants that are way too big with no belt. It was a Tow Cable so it wouldn't have any connectors along its length to hold it in place. My Death Star is bigger than your Death Star!"The XML is strong with this one!"http://miniprofile.xfire.com/bg/bg/type/0/teradyn.png
February 8, 200620 yr the stupid thing about the speeder v the at-at is that as soon as the at-at is down the speeder shoots the neck area and it blows up. why not just shoot between the neck in the first place?
February 9, 200620 yr because the neck is the connection to the bridge of the AT-AT and it being bent so heavy moves the armor playting and the AT-AT develops a gap between armor plating allowing Heavy Blaster fire or which ever to penetrate and dmg the AT-AT seeing that the tunnal connection is completly cracked, or thats my theory. http://miniprofile.xfire.com/bg/bg/type/2/nexeus.png
February 9, 200620 yr My theory is that the impact the AT-AT's head suffers when it trips causes the shields to go down. It bring upon us more of famine, death and war, you know religion has a lot to answer for. -Steve Harris, Iron Maiden
February 9, 200620 yr or when its standing, the pilots are smart and angle its head to pertect the neck
February 9, 200620 yr My theory is that the impact the AT-AT's head suffers when it trips causes the shields to go down.um, AT-AT don't have shilds Evacuate, in our moment of triumph. I think you overestimate their chances. Please can you post a comment on My clone story, in fan fiction. http://pff.swrebellion.com/index.php?topic=2306.0 (\_/)(O.O)(> <) This is Bunny. Copy Bunny into your signature to help him on his way to world Domination
February 10, 200620 yr What I can say from eaw-fr full version : AT-ATs can destroys Speeders quite easily . More, Veers's AT-AT can oneshot (or in two times) a speeder with the special fire ;pIA in this version only used lasers against my AT-AT
February 10, 200620 yr um, AT-AT don't have shilds Well...then....they crack the armor... in an unnoticeable way... ;D I like the one-shot ability. It bring upon us more of famine, death and war, you know religion has a lot to answer for. -Steve Harris, Iron Maiden
February 13, 200620 yr What I can say from eaw-fr full version : AT-ATs can destroys Speeders quite easily . More, Veers's AT-AT can oneshot (or in two times) a speeder with the special fire ;pIA in this version only used lasers against my AT-AT ummmmm all the ATATs should be able to destroy speeders in one shot, unless it's like a near hit or something like on luke's speeder in ESB
February 13, 200620 yr um, AT-AT don't have shilds Allegedly... But you can clearly see from the speeder's point of view, in one scene, that the laser fire 'hits' air and impacts a slight distance away from the hull of the machine.
February 13, 200620 yr i thought it is not possible yet to train more units on ground with the demo? and that new units auto spawn? http://miniprofile.xfire.com/bg/os/type/0/kingdark.png
February 13, 200620 yr yeah, isd spawns ties and bombersspace stations spawn shipshome one spawn x-wings and y-wingsbarricks spawn infintrylight factory spawn light tanksand so on
February 13, 200620 yr thats a shame realy i wanted to exterminate the invaders with my troops i trained. but i am happy that in the full version you can tran whatever you want when groundbattleing http://miniprofile.xfire.com/bg/os/type/0/kingdark.png
February 14, 200620 yr you sure? it would suprise me if you would not be able to train troops in the campaign http://miniprofile.xfire.com/bg/os/type/0/kingdark.png
February 14, 200620 yr If the AT-AT wasn't moving the cable would eventually fall down to the ground like a pair of pants that are way too big with no belt. It was a Tow Cable so it wouldn't have any connectors along its length to hold it in place. This is essentially correct. The Airspeeder's "tow cable" is more properly called a "trip cable" in the context of attacking an AT-AT. If the AT-AT is stationary, it cannot be tripped by the cable and the cable will fall harmlessly to the ground. Petroglyph Lead DesignerLas Vegas. Nevada, USA
Create an account or sign in to comment