Darkside360 Posted February 24, 2006 Share Posted February 24, 2006 Me, I give it 5 Stars all the way ;D For every victory there is a loss, for every loss there is a victoryhttp://legacy.gamemod.net/Images/LoWSig.gif http://legacy.gamemod.net/Images/Hoth.jpg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jedi mike Posted February 24, 2006 Share Posted February 24, 2006 who gave it 1 star : it is great 5 stars ;D "Nothing beats a good blaster at your side"Han Solo My screen name online is (PFF)Jedi_Mike Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 24, 2006 Share Posted February 24, 2006 3 will do :-\ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NOT Hadoken13 Posted February 24, 2006 Share Posted February 24, 2006 5 all the way!!!!! empire at war FTW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!I <3 petro!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!please....all of you at once marry me!!!!...please? (jk ) my EAW online screen name [PFF]HAdoken13 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sith Vrix Posted February 24, 2006 Share Posted February 24, 2006 5 stars of course Sith Lord Darth V`rix<>C&C Fan + SW Fan = EAW Fan (Thats me) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deriko Posted February 24, 2006 Share Posted February 24, 2006 I'd give it a 4.9, but since that isn't an option, I'll round it to 5! ;D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swgbex Posted February 24, 2006 Share Posted February 24, 2006 5 woo!!! love it http://www.swgbex.com/sig.jpgHehe IA 2 venator Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nick2730 Posted February 25, 2006 Share Posted February 25, 2006 2 stars Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popcorn2008 Posted February 26, 2006 Share Posted February 26, 2006 I would give it a 5... but these factors made me give it a 4: > Bug-Riddled. The single player campaign is bugged like crazy as is multiplayer connectivity. though this is mostly gamespys fault for the multiplayer the single player shouldnt be as bad as it is at times.> No Map Editor. I would have prefered a map editor along with the release instead of having to wait for "mod tools". BfII is still waiting for mod tools and its been 6 months. Lets hope this doesnt end up like them.> Death Star. Eh, I hate how you can't attack the death star while in tactical battle. Why cant red squadron attack it before it shots down the planet?> Land Battles. I wish they had anouter factor to them, besides just attacking. It needs something to make it less repetitive.> Bonus CD. Nothing really good on it, except the added maps. The screensavers look like beginer programming expierements and the wallpapers are so so. The concept art is pretty intereasting, ill give them that.> No DVD Format. This is really Lucas Arts fault. Here in America there was no DVD release. Why not? They need to get with the times.... even BF II had a DVD release.> No Diplomacy. Self explainatory.> Cutscenes. I would have loved more of these. Petro, words of wisdom, cutscenes are real fun to watch. ;D> The Ending. Well the Empires was a little short for me... and odd. We see the death star fire..? Then the emperor and vader in a death star hanger. I wish they would have conversated a bit more, to show us what the future was in this alternate time line. That would have been much fun. More words of wisdom, medium-long endings = success. As players feel they got what they worked for. As far as the rebel ending, I would have loved to see something more as well.> Trench Run. Why cant there be an element of chance envolved? If Lord Vader is in the imperial fleet we should see a cutscene with him trying to shoot Luke down. If the han solo is in the rebel fleet then this is thrawted but if not then luke is shot down. This would be an added balance for the game that would have been fun.> Geared toward non-technical players. I love micro managment. I loved Rebellion because of this. I wish they would have added more complex stories, and features. My real rating is more like 4.7/5 http://img525.imageshack.us/img525/3269/pffuserbar2globalmodnx9.jpg> Petroglyph Forums Moderator> LucasForums Moderator Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_talented Posted March 2, 2006 Share Posted March 2, 2006 four for me... too many.. how should i call it..... ...inconsistencies,complications,lag,other impediments Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wiking_pff Posted March 2, 2006 Share Posted March 2, 2006 The first day that I played it I would give it 5, a day after 4, but right now I think that 3 is the mark it deserves. Not bad at all, but certainly not outstanding. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kij0t Posted March 2, 2006 Share Posted March 2, 2006 I gave it a 2. Have not played it since release. Will only appeal to SW fans. Its not even that good a game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spiralarchitech Posted March 2, 2006 Share Posted March 2, 2006 I gave it 4. I think this is a fun action based rts, it might not be a complicated as rome-TW but to me this is a plus i don't want to be a stat whore or have to play 60 hours before i can be competent at the game. I like the diversity of having land and space battles combined with rebels or imperials it adds a good variety in the gameplay for me, i also like the campaigns although a tad short the conquest games are good fun in that when taking a planet you never know what you might run into initially, or when you come under attack what will be landing to take on the small force of 3 squads of stormtroopers you have for the defense of the planet. I much prefer this to the majority of other rts games which start of with me on one side and the AI on the other side of the map and its build a base time and maybe i might try out my new 1337 rush tactic ??? Graphics are good imo the textures maybe could be worked on but the heat/bloom effects look nice and the lasers/rockets explosions are v-nice, though i have not experienced the bugs other players have i do find land battles a bit slow and find it a game engine problem rather than a graphic one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teradyn_pff Posted March 2, 2006 Share Posted March 2, 2006 The problem with this game that I see is balance. The Rebels are way out of balance. The mark of the movies is apparent. Even with mistaken impressions from the movies. I give it a 2. My Death Star is bigger than your Death Star!"The XML is strong with this one!"http://miniprofile.xfire.com/bg/bg/type/0/teradyn.png Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sithwolf Posted March 2, 2006 Share Posted March 2, 2006 id give it 4 stars great game but would like bigger maps with luke and leia as playable ground units, other than this its ace Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now