jedi mike Posted January 31, 2006 Posted January 31, 2006 Hey i never really used them till now but the assult frigate is good if used right kind of weak and I'm not crazy about how it looks its kinda of weird looking no offence developers but those are minor flaws and Ive found it really useful to use the assult frigates to flank the enemy if it works then u have a decent war ship bearing down from the sides and if they see u they have enough strength to escape its kinda like the ugly duckling people under estimate and bam it blowing apart those victories and SD i have found a place for it in my fleet ;D "Nothing beats a good blaster at your side"Han Solo My screen name online is (PFF)Jedi_Mike
Teradyn_pff Posted January 31, 2006 Posted January 31, 2006 OMG, MY EYES! Someone give this poor soul some punctuation please! Seriously, your post doesn't even have an ending punctuation mark. And I don't know if it would have made your post any more understandable if you did have proper punctuation though. Are you saying that you like the Rebel Assault Frigate mk II? My Death Star is bigger than your Death Star!"The XML is strong with this one!"http://miniprofile.xfire.com/bg/bg/type/0/teradyn.png
jedi mike Posted January 31, 2006 Author Posted January 31, 2006 yes i like it . "Nothing beats a good blaster at your side"Han Solo My screen name online is (PFF)Jedi_Mike
Baron_Fel Posted February 1, 2006 Posted February 1, 2006 I like the design of the ship, IMO I never ever thought it would look like that from descriptions in EU books.I like it for design, not tactics, as I am a diehard Imperial. ;D "For every TIE fighter you shoot down, a thousand more rise to take its place"-Baron Felhttp://miniprofile.xfire.com/bg/sf/type/0/baronfel66.png
paladinmatt5 Posted February 1, 2006 Posted February 1, 2006 I still think I prefer the original Assault Frigate design. http://starwars.wikicities.com/wiki/Assault_Frigate That said, I do like the new design. It makes since too. Assault Frigates were just modified Rendili Dreadnaughts. As popular as they are, it would only be logical for them to build brand new ones built from the keel up to fill this role. That's just my opinion anyway. Outside a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside a dog, it's too dark to read. - Groucho Marx
jedi mike Posted February 1, 2006 Author Posted February 1, 2006 Ive seen alot of different variations of the assult frigate most of them are really cool. "Nothing beats a good blaster at your side"Han Solo My screen name online is (PFF)Jedi_Mike
paladinmatt5 Posted February 1, 2006 Posted February 1, 2006 It's always been one of my favorite ships. Outside a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside a dog, it's too dark to read. - Groucho Marx
NOT Hadoken13 Posted February 2, 2006 Posted February 2, 2006 i find that both the assault frigate Mk2 and the acclamator are underpowered in terms or defence but overpowered in terms of attack making them assault vehicles rather then juggernauts to absorb damage my EAW online screen name [PFF]HAdoken13
plokoon9619 Posted February 3, 2006 Posted February 3, 2006 The MK2 can't be canon as it's stats are uncanon, 1 turbolaser, 1 ion cannon, 2 laser cannons. Unless delphi releases stats to us that make sense the original ASF will be the best. This applys to the tartan, broad, and space stations.
Relentless Posted February 3, 2006 Posted February 3, 2006 The Assault Frigate is the ugliest ship in the game. It bring upon us more of famine, death and war, you know religion has a lot to answer for. -Steve Harris, Iron Maiden
Zer_Teron Posted February 3, 2006 Posted February 3, 2006 1 turbolaser, 1 ion cannon, 2 laser cannons There Batteries made up of multiple of their type, of course they dont say how many. Game should be near the bottom of the cannon line http://img20.imageshack.us/img20/3488/zersigef1.jpg
MerLock Posted February 3, 2006 Posted February 3, 2006 I'm new to all this stuff. Can someone explain to me what's the purpose of a frigate?
paladinmatt5 Posted February 3, 2006 Posted February 3, 2006 I'm new to all this stuff. Can someone explain to me what's the purpose of a frigate? Frigates are medium warships. Their designed to support larger warships, mainly by drawing fire from enemy ships, or by causing damage while the enemy focuses on the bigger ships. Outside a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside a dog, it's too dark to read. - Groucho Marx
Nevets Posted February 3, 2006 Posted February 3, 2006 The Assault Frigate is the ugliest ship in the game. I disagree, the broadside is probably ugliest, it is by far the most out of place one.
Relentless Posted February 3, 2006 Posted February 3, 2006 I disagree, the broadside is probably ugliest, it is by far the most out of place one. The Broadside is the second ugliest ship in the game. It bring upon us more of famine, death and war, you know religion has a lot to answer for. -Steve Harris, Iron Maiden
Teradyn_pff Posted February 3, 2006 Posted February 3, 2006 You are both ugly, so shut up. The looks are in there for good (until modded), so what about its function? My Death Star is bigger than your Death Star!"The XML is strong with this one!"http://miniprofile.xfire.com/bg/bg/type/0/teradyn.png
Mistrider Posted February 4, 2006 Posted February 4, 2006 I can't stand the Broadside. It reminds me too much of the Decimator from Star Wars: Galaxies(god I hate SOE for what they did to that game, but that is a rant for another time...). Back on topic, I think one of the first mods I will download is to change the Assault frigate to the cersion from X-Wing Alliance. And when he reaches Heaven,To St. Peter he will tell,"Just another soldier reporting Sir,I've served my time in Hell."
Deadeye31_pff Posted February 4, 2006 Posted February 4, 2006 that is also the version used in Rebellion, too. Ya know, you can use actual ships people know about in Star Wars games. It's not a very thin group of ship types they have in the Star Wars Universe.
The Saint Posted February 4, 2006 Posted February 4, 2006 Pfft, the Assault Frigate Mk2 is the most out of place...how do we skip the original and go straight to the Mk2? What about the Dreadnaught? Thank god for the modability of this game.
NOT Hadoken13 Posted February 4, 2006 Posted February 4, 2006 people seem to care a little to much about what ships look like or what they are called.we could easily make the AF.Mk.2 the [insert_great_name_here][/insert_great_name_here] and it wouldn't matter any more. as for the broad side other than it's name making absolutely no sense what is wrong with it ??? it is a missile corvette. the rebs. have one in the game too...the marauder. (though i am pretty sure a marauder didn't have missile tubes) a missile ship is usefull in my book! and i find them very helpful in a battle. my EAW online screen name [PFF]HAdoken13
Nevets Posted February 5, 2006 Posted February 5, 2006 people seem to care a little to much about what ships look like or what they are called.we could easily make the AF.Mk.2 the [insert_great_name_here][/insert_great_name_here] and it wouldn't matter any more. as for the broad side other than it's name making absolutely no sense what is wrong with it ??? it is a missile corvette. the rebs. have one in the game too...the marauder. (though i am pretty sure a marauder didn't have missile tubes) a missile ship is usefull in my book! and i find them very helpful in a battle. The difference between this game and other games is it is a star wars game. How a ship looks plays a big role in this game. I want to see ships I know and want them to look and feel star warsy, the broadside just doesn't do it. Now I know delphi said there were originally 50 models but they were cut down for ships that fitted certain roles. I still don't see why they just didn't give known ships new powers, they did it with other ships in game.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now