Darkmark Posted September 15, 2005 Posted September 15, 2005 I just wondered about the bounty hunters. I mean, we can expect Boba to side with the empire over the rebel scum, but what are other people's opinions of the others we see in EP5? I just figure since they sign up for the bounty on Han in EP5, that there's always the chance they are Imperial based heroes, but they don't really fit that perfectly. Neither do they really fit the rebel cause. I expect them to be in game, because as characters they're interesting and mildly important to the storyline, but how and who for I don't know. From what I recall, Zuckuss and 4LOM ended up with the rebels in the end, the IG-88s were all destroyed and seemed to work for themselves anyway, and Dengar seems an equal candidate for either side. So quite where they'd go, should they be in game, is a little of a mystery to me. Any ideas? "And the moral of the story is: Appreciate what you've got, because basically; I'm fantastic." ~ Holly, Red Dwarfhttp://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y143/Lord_Darkmark/Forcedbanner01.jpghttp://www.starwarsforced.co.uk
Nevets Posted September 15, 2005 Posted September 15, 2005 I expect to see several bounty hunters in as heroes. Dengar and Bossk (who also has a space ship called the Hound's Tooth) I think could be in the game. Also maybe even Greedo could make it in. Something I also find interesting is in this pic: http://www.pexsus.com/~littleb/eaw/veers/001.jpg all the empire's heroes have a red background, except one, boba fett. Could this mean that Boba does not belong to one side? Could he go to the side that can aford himt? Will other bounty hunters work this way?
Darkmark Posted September 15, 2005 Author Posted September 15, 2005 I hadn't noticed that. It does raise the question about hired heroes. From what I recall the heroes for the rebels had green backgrounds very much in contrast to the imperial ones, so they aren't rebel, that's for sure. Greedo I had the same feeling we'd see as these bounbty hunter guys, but since he was working for Jabba in the films and these guys for Vader I figured there was more chance of them having a definate side... If they're hireable though, that does change matters. Also, I can't believe I forgot to mention Bossk... Doh. "And the moral of the story is: Appreciate what you've got, because basically; I'm fantastic." ~ Holly, Red Dwarfhttp://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y143/Lord_Darkmark/Forcedbanner01.jpghttp://www.starwarsforced.co.uk
Naja Posted September 15, 2005 Posted September 15, 2005 That's a very good point, actually. It might just be a glitch, but it makes sense that bounty hunters would have no real ideological loyalty to either side; simply the one that pays the most. This obviously, would make the Empire the natural employer, at least until when/if the Rebels gained economic dominance. However, I remember a Petroglyph dude mentioning bounty hunters only glancingly in an interview, as the Empire's counter to the Rebel's espionage network. Since the Rebels can prettymuch see every major Imperial installation, know about every Imperial construction operation, and prepare for every Imperial fleet movement, it would seem only fair to give the Imps some sort of remedy. What part the bounty hunters would play remains a mystery. I doubt that there's going to be hero-capturing like there was in SW: Rebellion, so I assume that killing (or at least disabling) is the name of the game. The best guess I can give is that bounty hunters would provide a bonus against other heroes in combat (space or ground), and perhaps detect cloaked espionage units like Han & Chewie.
Foshjedi2004 Posted September 16, 2005 Posted September 16, 2005 AN IDEA BY FOSH: Some smugglers/ Pirates will only be for the Empire- IG88 and Greedo. Others can be hired by either side and payed to find characters and try to capture them. Therefore Han Solo and Chewie can be on either side initially then join the Rebels at a certain point. http://i199.photobucket.com/albums/aa197/knivesdamaster/tags/sith_omguserbar_member.jpg
Dorkthehunter Posted September 16, 2005 Posted September 16, 2005 What about Fett? Didn't he help the Rebels in one of the books? I remember from the Han Solo Trilogy, that he isn't that bad of a person. Or in the Unifying Force when he helps the Galactic Alliance. What about Dash Rendar of Talon Karrde? Both the Outrider and Wild Karrde are awesome! Protecting the world from those who have an IQ higher than 30! Huzzah! Trust me...I'm a professional. Some other members and I are trying to be superheroes and save the forums. But we can't do it on our own. We need your help! Join us! http://img504.imageshack.us/img504/5380/pffuserbar2modnp0.jpg
Garbageben Posted September 16, 2005 Posted September 16, 2005 Naw Fett wasn't bad. He was a mercenary who worked for you if you had enough money. He worked for the empire because they paid him to hunt Han Solo, not because he wanted to (although not necessarily true because there already was another bounty on Solo's head put by Jabba). Either way it all comes down to money. http://miniprofile.xfire.com/bg/sh/type/0/garbageben.png
Darkmark Posted September 16, 2005 Author Posted September 16, 2005 I always thought Fett had Empire sympathies. I'm pretty sure he had worked for the Imperials on many other occasions before the Han hunt in EP5... true it was mainly to do with the money, but I couldn't see him going to join the Rebels unless the sum was vast. Like I said elsewhere, I always considered him an Imperial sympathiser just as Kyle and Dash (and other mercs similar to them) were for the rebellion. Considering what the Jango story in EP2 gave us, I can understand entirely why Boba would be biased against the Jedi and their rebel cause. "And the moral of the story is: Appreciate what you've got, because basically; I'm fantastic." ~ Holly, Red Dwarfhttp://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y143/Lord_Darkmark/Forcedbanner01.jpghttp://www.starwarsforced.co.uk
TSKNF Posted September 16, 2005 Posted September 16, 2005 The Empire has a bigger pocketbook. Nuff said about Fett's loyalties. "My doctor says I have a malformed public duty gland and a natural deficiency in moral fibre and am therefore excused from saving universes"-Ford Prefecthttp://img154.imageshack.us/img154/9513/bam7hn.gif
Nevets Posted September 16, 2005 Posted September 16, 2005 The Empire has a bigger pocketbook. Nuff said about Fett's loyalties. And if in game the rebels turn the tide of battle, they would have the larger poketbook changing Fett's loyalty.
Foshjedi2004 Posted September 17, 2005 Posted September 17, 2005 Fett wasn't a friend or a foe of the Empire he was only an enemy of the Jedi. He went to the person with the most $$$. He however hated the Jedi because of the events of ATOC. http://i199.photobucket.com/albums/aa197/knivesdamaster/tags/sith_omguserbar_member.jpg
Darkmark Posted September 17, 2005 Author Posted September 17, 2005 With Luke on the rebel side, that logically means that he wouldn't support him or 'his' rebellion... which means he wouldn't be heartbroken should the Empire wipe out them out... all of them. Hence Imperial sympathies. The other bounty hunters didn't though from what I recall. They were just in it for the moolah... and one (I can't remebmber which) just got caught in the right place at the right time. "And the moral of the story is: Appreciate what you've got, because basically; I'm fantastic." ~ Holly, Red Dwarfhttp://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y143/Lord_Darkmark/Forcedbanner01.jpghttp://www.starwarsforced.co.uk
Dorkthehunter Posted September 19, 2005 Posted September 19, 2005 Did Boba Fett work for the Rebel Alliance (or New Republic) in one book? (not counting helping the Galactic Allaince in the Unifying Force) Protecting the world from those who have an IQ higher than 30! Huzzah! Trust me...I'm a professional. Some other members and I are trying to be superheroes and save the forums. But we can't do it on our own. We need your help! Join us! http://img504.imageshack.us/img504/5380/pffuserbar2modnp0.jpg
Fobdo Posted September 19, 2005 Posted September 19, 2005 Boba Fett had a helmet... Main Entry: hel·metPronunciation: 'hel-m&tFunction: nounEtymology: Middle French, diminutive of helme helmet, of Germanic origin; akin to Old English helm helmet, Old High German helan to conceal -- more at HELL1 : a covering or enclosing headpiece of ancient or medieval armor -- see ARMOR illustration2 : any of various protective head coverings usually made of a hard material to resist impact3 : something resembling a helmet Main Entry: 1sockPronunciation: 'säkFunction: nounInflected Form(s): plural socksEtymology: Middle English socke, from Old English socc, from Latin soccus1 archaic : a low shoe or slipper2 also plural sox /'säks/ : a knitted or woven covering for the foot usually extending above the ankle and sometimes to the knee3 a : a shoe worn by actors in Greek and Roman comedy b : comic drama- sock·less adjective Yub Yub commander
Ghostly_Substance Posted September 19, 2005 Posted September 19, 2005 Fobdo second warning out of three, change your sig to something smaller or be banned again unless someone changes the sig for you. -One Empire falls another riseshttp://myanimelist.net/signature/EuroSubstance.png http://miniprofile.xfire.com/bg/os/type/2/ghostlysubstance.png
Gen.Vader Posted September 19, 2005 Posted September 19, 2005 he has already been banned? i want to be banned too! why does he always have the most fun? hmph! fobdo just do as they ask, youll get a free cookie I've have you now - Lord Vader
Darkmark Posted September 20, 2005 Author Posted September 20, 2005 That can be arranged... But seriously, Boba aside who are we likely to see like the already mentioned 'Hero' bounty hunters? "And the moral of the story is: Appreciate what you've got, because basically; I'm fantastic." ~ Holly, Red Dwarfhttp://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y143/Lord_Darkmark/Forcedbanner01.jpghttp://www.starwarsforced.co.uk
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now