SOCL Posted December 12, 2007 Share Posted December 12, 2007 Reminds me of the insanity and nightmares I had while playing Half-Life 2 through for the first time. "We don't go to Ravenholm"... SOCL: Putting the BE in BEAK.Read the Forum Rules - Welcome the New Members - Rebellion Reloaded - Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mad78 Posted December 12, 2007 Share Posted December 12, 2007 "We don't go to Ravenholm"... I love that level!!! So much fun Zombie killing! http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a359/Mad78/Palpycard.gifhttp://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a359/Mad78/Spamkinguserbarcopy.jpgCLICK HERE IT IS VERY IMPORTANT!!!Click here is you like Trance Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eagle Posted December 17, 2007 Share Posted December 17, 2007 Here some nice linnks for all those of you who like to compare the ship sizes: http://www.imperialbastion.ru/images/COMPAREGIF.GIF http://www.wolfsshipyard.mystarship.com/CloneWars.htm http://img134.imageshack.us/img134/8214/idstowersenterprise7nj.jpg Who cares at all?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SOCL Posted December 17, 2007 Share Posted December 17, 2007 Very nice images, but most of the Star Destroyers are just resized Imperial-class. For instances, the "Allegiance-class" wouldn't have a large ventral hangar like the two Imperial classes... Just being BEAKing. SOCL: Putting the BE in BEAK.Read the Forum Rules - Welcome the New Members - Rebellion Reloaded - Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jahled Posted December 17, 2007 Share Posted December 17, 2007 Very nice images, but most of the Star Destroyers are just resized Imperial-class. For instances, the "Allegiance-class" wouldn't have a large ventral hangar like the two Imperial classes... Just being BEAKing. A worthy beak. If you follow the SW expanded universe with deft geek-accuracy, you will observe there never were stuff like Allegiance-class Star Destroyers (it was the name of a SSD that incredibly was taken out due to surprise), other than in the completely over the top artwork of artists who perhaps care less to attention to the SW universe than geeks who by definition have over analyzed every comic image ever seen, and created an incredible website of pointless detail, now sadly EU 'canon.' Sorry, but force.net is about the saddest thing I've seen, concerning my status as a Star Wars enthusiast, simply down to the dickhead who is comming out with the over the top analysis, given his fanatical attention to things in three decades of SW comics Edit:http://www2.b3ta.com/host/creative/9805/1197838950/Leiatheskintstudent.jpg Now that's for Paul http://www.jahled.co.uk/smallmonkeywars.gif Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SOCL Posted December 18, 2007 Share Posted December 18, 2007 You have a point, Jahled. I don't even know why I bothered posting something like that... I honestly used to follow some of that nonsense as though it were some sort of holy scripture, but in time and with the passing of a few years, I've come to realize that over analysis and this concept LucasFilm has of explaining every detail of Star Wars is ruining the franchise--indeed, there remains nearly no mystique to any facet of Star Wars, to include THE FORCE! Eck. SOCL: Putting the BE in BEAK.Read the Forum Rules - Welcome the New Members - Rebellion Reloaded - Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eagle Posted December 18, 2007 Share Posted December 18, 2007 Leia looks very sexy. Paul would have loved that pic. Who cares at all?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth_Rob Posted December 18, 2007 Share Posted December 18, 2007 Speaking of which, I haven't seen much of Paul as of late. Your feeble skills are no match for the power of the Dark Side! My Website http://fp.profiles.us.playstation.com/playstation/psn/pid/BigBadBob113.png Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eagle Posted December 18, 2007 Share Posted December 18, 2007 Rob, I´m sorry to say this, but Paul isn´t with us anymore:http://www.swrebellion.com/forums/postt4096.html Who cares at all?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth_Rob Posted December 18, 2007 Share Posted December 18, 2007 Thanks Eagle. I can't believe I missed that thread. I think it was because it was a sticky, and I tend to ignore them. Your feeble skills are no match for the power of the Dark Side! My Website http://fp.profiles.us.playstation.com/playstation/psn/pid/BigBadBob113.png Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Defender_16 Posted December 20, 2007 Share Posted December 20, 2007 I took the old Nebulon, cut it down and made it into a convoy escort. (I know, the origional is supposed to be a convoy escort too.) It's got improved armour and has roughly the same weapons compliment but can only carry a handful of fighters if any. As an added bonus, because of the decreased mass it's faster and has a better turning rate. http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h293/Defender_16/KDYLFRG01.gif Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mad78 Posted December 20, 2007 Share Posted December 20, 2007 I love it! Which period would extimate it to be? Rise of the Empire? http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a359/Mad78/Palpycard.gifhttp://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a359/Mad78/Spamkinguserbarcopy.jpgCLICK HERE IT IS VERY IMPORTANT!!!Click here is you like Trance Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Defender_16 Posted December 20, 2007 Share Posted December 20, 2007 Some time after the Nebulon B came out and the Imperial Navy started to realise it wasn't quite as great as advertised. Post Hoth or Post Endor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JanDeis Posted December 21, 2007 Share Posted December 21, 2007 Kind of off topic, but what would mass and weight matter in space? If you thrust in one direction, you go the same speed the oppisite direction no matter your mass. I like it though Def. About time the Nebulon-B got some help (fighters). And a little more armor. Thing is always going down, except in the movies... http://www.freewebs.com/deisgames/index.htm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krytos Posted December 21, 2007 Share Posted December 21, 2007 Kind of off topic, but what would mass and weight matter in space? If you thrust in one direction, you go the same speed the oppisite direction no matter your mass. I like it though Def. About time the Nebulon-B got some help (fighters). And a little more armor. Thing is always going down, except in the movies... Acceleration is still dependant on mass (correct me if I'm wrong) http://img146.imageshack.us/img146/1778/reloadedbannerdu8.gifhttp://img152.imageshack.us/img152/1333/3dartistbanneranimationws1.gifhttp://img154.imageshack.us/img154/4026/rebellionbannerdi2.gif Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ElvisMiggell Posted December 21, 2007 Share Posted December 21, 2007 Sort of... it's why we call it science fiction! Elvismiggell. Strike me down and i will become more powerful than you can ever imagine... Nu kyr'adyc, shi taab'echaaj'la Not gone, merely marching far away Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JanDeis Posted December 21, 2007 Share Posted December 21, 2007 Acceleration is still dependant on mass (correct me if I'm wrong) F=ma Force equals mass times acceleration (I'm a physics student). But, in space, If an astronaut is not attached to the space shuttle and he drifts too far away, he can take that backpack looking thingy off his back and push off of it. Whatever amount of force the astronaut exerts on the backpack, the same amount of force pushes him in the opposite direction. So, if a giant space cruiser fires its thrusters in one direction, the ship moves in the opposite direction with whatever amount of force the thrusters exert. It would just take a big push on the other side of the ship to stop the thing from turning, because of the big mass. But in space, that amount of force isn't very hard to come by since no other forces are interrupting the system (gravity, friction, etc.). http://www.freewebs.com/deisgames/index.htm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eagle Posted December 21, 2007 Share Posted December 21, 2007 (I'm a physics student).Luckily you didn´t became a Trekkie. Who cares at all?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krytos Posted December 22, 2007 Share Posted December 22, 2007 Acceleration is still dependant on mass (correct me if I'm wrong) F=ma Force equals mass times acceleration (I'm a physics student). But, in space, If an astronaut is not attached to the space shuttle and he drifts too far away, he can take that backpack looking thingy off his back and push off of it. Whatever amount of force the astronaut exerts on the backpack, the same amount of force pushes him in the opposite direction. So, if a giant space cruiser fires its thrusters in one direction, the ship moves in the opposite direction with whatever amount of force the thrusters exert. It would just take a big push on the other side of the ship to stop the thing from turning, because of the big mass. But in space, that amount of force isn't very hard to come by since no other forces are interrupting the system (gravity, friction, etc.).Exactly, so mass is still a determining factor. If we transpose the equation it becomes:A = F/MAnd in the case of Def's ship, modifying an existing ship by reducing its mass but keeping the same amount of force it produces (ie. the engine) the acceleration would be improved. Obviously this is all science fiction, and as such we can't slot anything into this equations - but on a completely theoretical level it still works. After all, a ship measuring 300 hundred odd metres, equipped with massive engines, thick armour for combat, weapons, personal etc. it's going to have a rather large mass..ok, huge mass - requiring massive thrust blah blah blah. But, like Elvis said - it's just science fiction Doesn't matter if it's perfect, it's fun. http://img146.imageshack.us/img146/1778/reloadedbannerdu8.gifhttp://img152.imageshack.us/img152/1333/3dartistbanneranimationws1.gifhttp://img154.imageshack.us/img154/4026/rebellionbannerdi2.gif Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Defender_16 Posted December 22, 2007 Share Posted December 22, 2007 (edited) About time the Nebulon-B got some help (fighters). The origional Nebulon B carried 24 Tie Starfighters. This can only carry about 5 if youre lucky. In other news, 1. The old tie Starfighter size as listed in Wookiepedia is wrong. 2. I totally screwed up when scaling my old Tie craft (Which I had already figured out.) But have since corrected it! (Sorta.) http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h293/Defender_16/TieVengeanceCOMPARISON.gif Edited December 31, 2007 by Defender_16 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mad78 Posted December 22, 2007 Share Posted December 22, 2007 Nice work Def. I can't remeber now. YOu use AutoCAD don't you? http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a359/Mad78/Palpycard.gifhttp://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a359/Mad78/Spamkinguserbarcopy.jpgCLICK HERE IT IS VERY IMPORTANT!!!Click here is you like Trance Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Defender_16 Posted December 22, 2007 Share Posted December 22, 2007 I used AutoCAD for the origional design, but have been using paint for scaling all of my fighters to the same size. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krytos Posted December 23, 2007 Share Posted December 23, 2007 http://img45.imageshack.us/img45/9955/christmasswrpb5.th.jpg http://img146.imageshack.us/img146/1778/reloadedbannerdu8.gifhttp://img152.imageshack.us/img152/1333/3dartistbanneranimationws1.gifhttp://img154.imageshack.us/img154/4026/rebellionbannerdi2.gif Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eagle Posted December 23, 2007 Share Posted December 23, 2007 Thank you, Krytos! Also merry christmass to everyone! French castle sculptured totally of ice in china: http://img133.imageshack.us/img133/4753/icegrwp9.jpg (source: badische-zeitung.de) Who cares at all?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Defender_16 Posted December 24, 2007 Share Posted December 24, 2007 Looks like a lot of work. I wonder how long it will take to melt? Hapan Miy'til Starfighter http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h293/Defender_16/MiytilstarfighterHapan.gif Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now