:'( :'(

 

http://media.pc.ign.com/media/713/713904/vids_1.html

 

All the good things they were saying sounded like it would have scored much better! I still have faith though.... Still got the faith.... :-\

It even says the rating is "Good" on the rating thing. Don't see the point in crying.

One thing you got to consider dont take what IGN say by the book thier reviwers are utter crap imo, the only site i trust to make a good Review is Gamespot, and on Gamespot it scores highley well around 9.4 with the users atm.

 

I heard what was said in the IGN video, that guy had neither enthusiasim or the correct mindset to review EAW, he was mostly biased and sounded like he was realy board, also he never did any homework on EAW, his comment saying why Hoth battle isnt in etc and more stuff from movies shows he has a lack of looking around and seeing what the game was about atm and that all other stuff will come in an expansion.

 

If i were the editor or Manager of IGN id give the bad reviewers a reprimand lol.

good i read the comment of you guys first, i decided not to watch the interview, but since i already have it, i dont realy care

Gamespot gave it a score of 8.4 I think 

8.7

IGN did not say it was that good, and they were right about the models.

IGN knows jack S***t about the game ;D the game playes great, i got it today and im having a blast as the Empire atm in the Campaigne, its much larger scope then they say or even mention, the ships are balanced and are great looking in combat, cant get any better then this.

 

Dont let the negativity of this one reviewer site get to you, seriusly its worth it imo. I havent had any stability issues or problems or bugs, im playing with 1.2 mind you but still, also i dont have graphics full cranked up atm but 80% thier or 90% and even then its great.

 

Ground combat is a good challange too pending what the AI dose.

Id say they were bought off by EA. its pretty obvious they were bias. if you look they complain about the groudn game graphics. and the screenshots they show of the ground game for the review they posted look bad but are also obviously set to low on all graphics settings.

 

On full settings there isnt an RTS that can rival EAW

EXCEPT THIS:

 

http://pcmedia.ign.com/pc/image/article/643/643999/company-of-heroes-20050820001422688.jpg

http://pcmedia.ign.com/pc/image/article/613/613450/company-of-heroes-20050513113936359.jpg

 

Company of heroes, read on the AI, it is incredible.

 

http://pc.ign.com/objects/743/743961.html

Edited February 18, 200620 yr by Megajames

I wouldn't quite say that EaW is that awesome looking at full settings.  As MJ just showed you CoH definitely outclasses EaW in the visual department (not to mention physics and other things).  However I'm going to be getting Company of Heroes in addition to BFME2 and EaW so I'll get to experience them all. ;D

That review sounded about right

 

or the correct mindset

 

the correct mindset? What kind of mindset do you want? Do you want a hard core star wars fan to review it and give it full points because he likes it? He didn't really sound biased either.

whoa cheeseinator slow down bucko this was from a little less than a month ago... im willing to bet hes long forgot about that :-\

EXCEPT THIS:

 

http://pcmedia.ign.com/pc/image/article/643/643999/company-of-heroes-20050820001422688.jpg

http://pcmedia.ign.com/pc/image/article/613/613450/company-of-heroes-20050513113936359.jpg

 

Company of heroes, read on the AI, it is incredible.

 

http://pc.ign.com/objects/743/743961.html

 

Duh duh duh duh duh duh duhduh duh duh duh duh, duh duh duh duh  : : :

well yes that game looks awesome it is fully destructable awesome phisics...blah blah blah....but will your pc be able to run it?

i know mine won't

I played the first game 'soldiers' its a good game, probaly on budget now, i would buy that before the new one as it'll let you see what its like.

 

As its not a traditional rts type game but it is good just maybe not for everyone.