I was wondering is it better to send 2 people on the same mission to d osome research or 1 at a time. I know with other missions the more the marier, or am I wrong on that one too. Please help

 

The Swarm

im not sure, on other missions its best to have a group but does it go faster in Rand D with two seperate or two People on the same mission?

I have tried both and haven't seen much of a diference. mabye it's just me. but that is the quest i am asking.

i always put all my researchers in the same mission

I think you should put all your researchers in the same misson.

I agree. I think the manual said they combine their stats when you pool all your researchers.

 

Of course, if that's true, why doesn't the stupid AI combine them?

 

Anyway, I always combine my researchers, just to be on the safe side.

i what just thinking that if you have more missions you have more of a chance of getting something

RESIGNED!!! REMOVE ACCOUNT!!!

Edited September 6, 200323 yr by Pucho777

I always do my researchers making their missions alone Somtimes I had 3 ship researchers, 2 facility and 2 troop training researchers on coruscant and perhaps a recruitment or espionage with the emperor there are 8 missions on coruscant

I always send them on separate missions..

Separate missions seem to work out better for missions where you aren't concerned about being actively foiled R&D, Recruit, and diplomacy.

 

My theory on diplomacy being individual characters in seperate missions is Leia/Mon Mothma/Dodonna will almost always succeed, but those extra 1/10 or 1/20 chance that one of your "bounty hunters" (Chewie, Orinmarinko, Han) will succede can speed up the time to move a system to 100% support.

My theory on diplomacy being individual characters in seperate missions is Leia/Mon Mothma/Dodonna will almost always succeed, but those extra 1/10 or 1/20 chance that one of your "bounty hunters" (Chewie, Orinmarinko, Han) will succede can speed up the time to move a system to 100% support.

 

 

Yes yor are writh

i've read some places that it really doesn't matter. and you're right about stats being pooled for sucess for a mission, but R&D doesn't have anything to do with stats, only the ability to researh, and even looking at the research levels in rebed, i don't know, and don't think that these would rise as R&D missions go on. but think of this, if you put three people together on a research mission, only one reports, maybe every report would be a positive one, i've never tried, but if you have three seperate missions, even if on the same system, you get three reports for the price of one, and even if one or two of this is no progress, i don't think you'd be losing anything. i think of R&D kind of like diplomacy, with an unseen bar going up and up as progress is made until it hits 100%. just as if you sent three diplomats to one system, with three sucessful reports the diplomacy shift will be alot more than if you had one sucessful report with a team of diplomats working together. remember, the sucess or not is affected by pooled stats, not the level of success, or at least this had been my experience. three diplomats working seperately on the same system will finish that system off much faster than a team. this i have tested and it seems to work this way for me. i think of R&D the same way, so i go with seperate missions, and from what i've seen in the games i've played, in all areas my R&D is usually ahead of my opponent, although that's hard to judge. i think i just cofused myself, but i hope this may help you a bit, lol.