admiral boty Posted March 22, 2007 Posted March 22, 2007 What spacecrafts do you prefer in space battles? CIS:? Rebellion:?Empire:?Republic:? http://myspacebrand.com/userbars/1/european.gifhttp://img338.imageshack.us/img338/8792/empireuserbarru2.pnghttp://img410.imageshack.us/img410/3138/rcuserbarrz9.pnghttp://img48.imageshack.us/img48/6922/sweawubanso8.pnghttp://Hungarian.Socialist.Party.WillBeDefeated.com/
Controller Posted March 22, 2007 Posted March 22, 2007 well lets see, because the four side have almost identical ships(ie TIEs with missiles) i have to go with the the fast intercepter(TIE Intercepter, Tri-Droid, Jedi Starfighter, A-wing), ok now [rant]1) why is it that on the republic side the V-wing is made a bomber, when it was the main fighter for the republic, if they needed to make a bomber from well know ships the ARC-170 would have been a better choice, 2) why is it that the empire uses a transport that is out-dated and was never meant for troop movement, when the empire already has the the Sentinel-class transport, even the Lambda-class landing craft would have been a better choice3)why do bombs fall in space?, theres no gravity, they should just go straight[/rant]/color] http://i74.photobucket.com/albums/i276/At-At_controller/leetspeak4cz1jr.gif
Logan Felipe Posted March 22, 2007 Posted March 22, 2007 well lets see, because the four side have almost identical ships(ie TIEs with missiles) i have to go with the the fast intercepter(TIE Intercepter, Tri-Droid, Jedi Starfighter, A-wing), ok now [rant]1) why is it that on the republic side the V-wing is made a bomber, when it was the main fighter for the republic, if they needed to make a bomber from well know ships the ARC-170 would have been a better choice, 2) why is it that the empire uses a transport that is out-dated and was never meant for troop movement, when the empire already has the the Sentinel-class transport, even the Lambda-class landing craft would have been a better choice3)why do bombs fall in space?, theres no gravity, they should just go straight[/rant]/color] yeah.A v-wing can barely hold 1 bomb, let alone infinite . Then there's the Tri-fighter "machine gun"... : http://miniprofile.xfire.com/bg/sf/type/0/captainartenon.pnghttp://z4.invisionfree.com/The_Sith_Lords_EaW/index.php?act=Attach&type=post&id=5554600Alternate Sitehttp://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a245/loverdog/pffuserbar1.jpghttp://img228.imageshack.us/img228/6296/sweawuban0cg.pngPetition for Obsidian and Bioware to work on Knights of the Old Republic III together! 3926 Total Signatures and counting!SW Fanon Wiki entry - Captain Artenon"A fake news show on fox should have real news!" -Louis Black, The Daily Show.
HK-47 Posted March 22, 2007 Posted March 22, 2007 1) why is it that on the republic side the V-wing is made a bomber, when it was the main fighter for the republic, if they needed to make a bomber from well know ships the ARC-170 would have been a better choice, 2) why is it that the empire uses a transport that is out-dated and was never meant for troop movement, when the empire already has the the Sentinel-class transport, even the Lambda-class landing craft would have been a better choice3)why do bombs fall in space?, theres no gravity, they should just go straight[/rant]/color] Yeah, I agree. They should put the Sentinel, not EPIII Palpatine's shuttle. And why does the ARC-170 have only one position?! Then there's the Tri-fighter "machine gun"... Yes, that's RIDICULOUS! If you guys want a near than realistic space battle in Battlefront II, download "Battle Over Coruscant - BOC" in BFII Files. And there's a land map called Verena Defense Immortal (from the same author), that has the correct Tri-Fighter (and makes it's missiles more good-looking - uses the missile projectile instead of blue lines )
Droid803 Posted March 22, 2007 Posted March 22, 2007 lol, it doesn't matter which ship.They're all the same except for looks. They even HAVE a Sentinel model! They use it for the death star campaign map! http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v423/kc1991/droid803sig.jpg"That was fun"
HK-47 Posted March 22, 2007 Posted March 22, 2007 They use it for the death star campaign map! It also appear in the Kamino mission (Changing Out the Guard, isn't it?).
Guest Posted March 23, 2007 Posted March 23, 2007 and the ARC 170 having no gunner, that one burned me when I got the game. You should have another seat in it where someone could man the rear guns. the ARC-170 really has 3 pilots but for the sake of gameplay you'd only need 2
Droid803 Posted March 23, 2007 Posted March 23, 2007 The rear guns don't do anything, they're for show. Which is BS... thats why we have mods and mod maps. lol http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v423/kc1991/droid803sig.jpg"That was fun"
admiral boty Posted March 24, 2007 Author Posted March 24, 2007 The rear guns don't do anything, they're for show. Which is BS... thats why we have mods and mod maps. lol Can you mod battlefront too? http://myspacebrand.com/userbars/1/european.gifhttp://img338.imageshack.us/img338/8792/empireuserbarru2.pnghttp://img410.imageshack.us/img410/3138/rcuserbarrz9.pnghttp://img48.imageshack.us/img48/6922/sweawubanso8.pnghttp://Hungarian.Socialist.Party.WillBeDefeated.com/
Grand Admiral Thrawn 889 Posted April 7, 2007 Posted April 7, 2007 i perfer the GAR's ships for space and maybe the Super Battle Drods for land as they are still the most Versatile of the Units in the game with the wrist Rocket Launcher. http://i115.photobucket.com/albums/n292/Admiral_Antilles/Thrawncopy.jpghttp://img525.imageshack.us/img525/3269/pffuserbar2globalmodnx9.jpg I Support the Resistance!
Mikan Cyclone Posted April 8, 2007 Posted April 8, 2007 Hmmm...Tie Bomber, CIS Bomber, ARC 170, and I don't play as the rebels. EVER. http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a245/loverdog/pffuserbar1.jpghttp://i74.photobucket.com/albums/i276/At-At_controller/leetspeak4cz1jr.gif
HK-47 Posted April 9, 2007 Posted April 9, 2007 I don't play as the rebels. EVER. That blasted scum! HATE BOTHANS! ;D
Grand Admiral Thrawn 889 Posted April 9, 2007 Posted April 9, 2007 does anyone else find the Space battle wanting? i mean they add a new dimension to the game but still they just lack in the depth themselves, the way that to win you don't have to engage any other crafts to win and they really don't work very well when you team it up. i like them but i think they can be improved. http://i115.photobucket.com/albums/n292/Admiral_Antilles/Thrawncopy.jpghttp://img525.imageshack.us/img525/3269/pffuserbar2globalmodnx9.jpg I Support the Resistance!
Mikan Cyclone Posted April 9, 2007 Posted April 9, 2007 It's not what I'd prefer in anyway, no. I don't agree with a lot of things about the space battles, but It's out, so whatever... http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a245/loverdog/pffuserbar1.jpghttp://i74.photobucket.com/albums/i276/At-At_controller/leetspeak4cz1jr.gif
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now