OMEGA Posted February 16, 2006 Posted February 16, 2006 :'( :'( http://media.pc.ign.com/media/713/713904/vids_1.html All the good things they were saying sounded like it would have scored much better! I still have faith though.... Still got the faith.... :-\ "The Dark Side of the Force is a pathway to many abilities some would consider to be unnatural."- Darth Sidious http://img481.imageshack.us/img481/2268/tfomegag25vz.jpg
Nevets Posted February 16, 2006 Posted February 16, 2006 It even says the rating is "Good" on the rating thing. Don't see the point in crying.
Darksythe Posted February 16, 2006 Posted February 16, 2006 One thing you got to consider dont take what IGN say by the book thier reviwers are utter crap imo, the only site i trust to make a good Review is Gamespot, and on Gamespot it scores highley well around 9.4 with the users atm. I heard what was said in the IGN video, that guy had neither enthusiasim or the correct mindset to review EAW, he was mostly biased and sounded like he was realy board, also he never did any homework on EAW, his comment saying why Hoth battle isnt in etc and more stuff from movies shows he has a lack of looking around and seeing what the game was about atm and that all other stuff will come in an expansion. If i were the editor or Manager of IGN id give the bad reviewers a reprimand lol. http://miniprofile.xfire.com/bg/bg/type/2/nexeus.png
kingdark Posted February 17, 2006 Posted February 17, 2006 good i read the comment of you guys first, i decided not to watch the interview, but since i already have it, i dont realy care http://miniprofile.xfire.com/bg/os/type/0/kingdark.png
EJMM Posted February 17, 2006 Posted February 17, 2006 8.7 http://miniprofile.xfire.com/bg/bg/type/2/Darksitheduardo.png
Megajames Posted February 18, 2006 Posted February 18, 2006 IGN did not say it was that good, and they were right about the models. Evacuate, in our moment of triumph. I think you overestimate their chances. Please can you post a comment on My clone story, in fan fiction. http://pff.swrebellion.com/index.php?topic=2306.0 (\_/)(O.O)(> <) This is Bunny. Copy Bunny into your signature to help him on his way to world Domination
Darksythe Posted February 18, 2006 Posted February 18, 2006 IGN knows jack S***t about the game ;D the game playes great, i got it today and im having a blast as the Empire atm in the Campaigne, its much larger scope then they say or even mention, the ships are balanced and are great looking in combat, cant get any better then this. Dont let the negativity of this one reviewer site get to you, seriusly its worth it imo. I havent had any stability issues or problems or bugs, im playing with 1.2 mind you but still, also i dont have graphics full cranked up atm but 80% thier or 90% and even then its great. Ground combat is a good challange too pending what the AI dose. http://miniprofile.xfire.com/bg/bg/type/2/nexeus.png
vasuba_pff Posted February 18, 2006 Posted February 18, 2006 Id say they were bought off by EA. its pretty obvious they were bias. if you look they complain about the groudn game graphics. and the screenshots they show of the ground game for the review they posted look bad but are also obviously set to low on all graphics settings. On full settings there isnt an RTS that can rival EAW
Megajames Posted February 18, 2006 Posted February 18, 2006 (edited) EXCEPT THIS: http://pcmedia.ign.com/pc/image/article/643/643999/company-of-heroes-20050820001422688.jpghttp://pcmedia.ign.com/pc/image/article/613/613450/company-of-heroes-20050513113936359.jpg Company of heroes, read on the AI, it is incredible. http://pc.ign.com/objects/743/743961.html Edited February 18, 2006 by Megajames Evacuate, in our moment of triumph. I think you overestimate their chances. Please can you post a comment on My clone story, in fan fiction. http://pff.swrebellion.com/index.php?topic=2306.0 (\_/)(O.O)(> <) This is Bunny. Copy Bunny into your signature to help him on his way to world Domination
Garbageben Posted February 19, 2006 Posted February 19, 2006 I wouldn't quite say that EaW is that awesome looking at full settings. As MJ just showed you CoH definitely outclasses EaW in the visual department (not to mention physics and other things). However I'm going to be getting Company of Heroes in addition to BFME2 and EaW so I'll get to experience them all. ;D http://miniprofile.xfire.com/bg/sh/type/0/garbageben.png
Guest Posted March 3, 2006 Posted March 3, 2006 That review sounded about right or the correct mindset the correct mindset? What kind of mindset do you want? Do you want a hard core star wars fan to review it and give it full points because he likes it? He didn't really sound biased either.
The_talented Posted March 3, 2006 Posted March 3, 2006 whoa cheeseinator slow down bucko this was from a little less than a month ago... im willing to bet hes long forgot about that :-\
Star Wars Man Posted March 3, 2006 Posted March 3, 2006 EXCEPT THIS: http://pcmedia.ign.com/pc/image/article/643/643999/company-of-heroes-20050820001422688.jpghttp://pcmedia.ign.com/pc/image/article/613/613450/company-of-heroes-20050513113936359.jpg Company of heroes, read on the AI, it is incredible. http://pc.ign.com/objects/743/743961.html Duh duh duh duh duh duh duhduh duh duh duh duh, duh duh duh duh : : : http://img525.imageshack.us/img525/3269/pffuserbar2globalmodnx9.jpg
NOT Hadoken13 Posted March 10, 2006 Posted March 10, 2006 well yes that game looks awesome it is fully destructable awesome phisics...blah blah blah....but will your pc be able to run it?i know mine won't my EAW online screen name [PFF]HAdoken13
Spiralarchitech Posted March 13, 2006 Posted March 13, 2006 I played the first game 'soldiers' its a good game, probaly on budget now, i would buy that before the new one as it'll let you see what its like. As its not a traditional rts type game but it is good just maybe not for everyone.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now