The Saint Posted February 5, 2006 Posted February 5, 2006 They did it with Lasers Laser cannons on a starfighter are more powerful than on the converted civilian airspeeders.
Megajames Posted February 5, 2006 Posted February 5, 2006 the speeders had baster cannons, x-wings have laser Evacuate, in our moment of triumph. I think you overestimate their chances. Please can you post a comment on My clone story, in fan fiction. http://pff.swrebellion.com/index.php?topic=2306.0 (\_/)(O.O)(> <) This is Bunny. Copy Bunny into your signature to help him on his way to world Domination
MastaSpoofa Posted February 5, 2006 Posted February 5, 2006 theres a difference between blaster cannons and laser cannons, Xwings have laser, Speeders have blaster. Blasters are weaker. http://starwars.wikicities.com/images/thumb/7/73/300px-Imperial_Fleet.jpgLong live the Venator!
Darksythe Posted February 8, 2006 Posted February 8, 2006 IMO AT-AT's cannot be beaten if thier standing still witha tow cable around them, tahts why its not a garunteed sucess, i think in the game if the AT-AT isnt moving your got 0% of geting the AT-AT down now if its moving thats another thing, apart from that its nearly invunrable most things apart from realy heavy guns etc. I hope its also baised like this in the full version. The Tow cable is primerly a trip cable in how it works with AT-AT'S if the AT-AT dosnt move then he cant trip lol, simple realy. http://miniprofile.xfire.com/bg/bg/type/2/nexeus.png
shadowsfm Posted February 8, 2006 Posted February 8, 2006 wouldnt the cable still be around them when they start moving again?
Teradyn_pff Posted February 8, 2006 Posted February 8, 2006 That is questionable. If the AT-AT wasn't moving the cable would eventually fall down to the ground like a pair of pants that are way too big with no belt. It was a Tow Cable so it wouldn't have any connectors along its length to hold it in place. My Death Star is bigger than your Death Star!"The XML is strong with this one!"http://miniprofile.xfire.com/bg/bg/type/0/teradyn.png
sithwolf Posted February 8, 2006 Posted February 8, 2006 the stupid thing about the speeder v the at-at is that as soon as the at-at is down the speeder shoots the neck area and it blows up. why not just shoot between the neck in the first place?
Darksythe Posted February 9, 2006 Posted February 9, 2006 because the neck is the connection to the bridge of the AT-AT and it being bent so heavy moves the armor playting and the AT-AT develops a gap between armor plating allowing Heavy Blaster fire or which ever to penetrate and dmg the AT-AT seeing that the tunnal connection is completly cracked, or thats my theory. http://miniprofile.xfire.com/bg/bg/type/2/nexeus.png
Relentless Posted February 9, 2006 Posted February 9, 2006 My theory is that the impact the AT-AT's head suffers when it trips causes the shields to go down. It bring upon us more of famine, death and war, you know religion has a lot to answer for. -Steve Harris, Iron Maiden
shadowsfm Posted February 9, 2006 Posted February 9, 2006 or when its standing, the pilots are smart and angle its head to pertect the neck
Megajames Posted February 9, 2006 Posted February 9, 2006 My theory is that the impact the AT-AT's head suffers when it trips causes the shields to go down.um, AT-AT don't have shilds Evacuate, in our moment of triumph. I think you overestimate their chances. Please can you post a comment on My clone story, in fan fiction. http://pff.swrebellion.com/index.php?topic=2306.0 (\_/)(O.O)(> <) This is Bunny. Copy Bunny into your signature to help him on his way to world Domination
Siddus Posted February 10, 2006 Posted February 10, 2006 What I can say from eaw-fr full version : AT-ATs can destroys Speeders quite easily . More, Veers's AT-AT can oneshot (or in two times) a speeder with the special fire ;pIA in this version only used lasers against my AT-AT
Relentless Posted February 10, 2006 Posted February 10, 2006 um, AT-AT don't have shilds Well...then....they crack the armor... in an unnoticeable way... ;D I like the one-shot ability. It bring upon us more of famine, death and war, you know religion has a lot to answer for. -Steve Harris, Iron Maiden
Guest Posted February 13, 2006 Posted February 13, 2006 What I can say from eaw-fr full version : AT-ATs can destroys Speeders quite easily . More, Veers's AT-AT can oneshot (or in two times) a speeder with the special fire ;pIA in this version only used lasers against my AT-AT ummmmm all the ATATs should be able to destroy speeders in one shot, unless it's like a near hit or something like on luke's speeder in ESB
Xenomorphine Posted February 13, 2006 Posted February 13, 2006 um, AT-AT don't have shilds Allegedly... But you can clearly see from the speeder's point of view, in one scene, that the laser fire 'hits' air and impacts a slight distance away from the hull of the machine.
kingdark Posted February 13, 2006 Posted February 13, 2006 i thought it is not possible yet to train more units on ground with the demo? and that new units auto spawn? http://miniprofile.xfire.com/bg/os/type/0/kingdark.png
shadowsfm Posted February 13, 2006 Posted February 13, 2006 yeah, isd spawns ties and bombersspace stations spawn shipshome one spawn x-wings and y-wingsbarricks spawn infintrylight factory spawn light tanksand so on
kingdark Posted February 13, 2006 Posted February 13, 2006 thats a shame realy i wanted to exterminate the invaders with my troops i trained. but i am happy that in the full version you can tran whatever you want when groundbattleing http://miniprofile.xfire.com/bg/os/type/0/kingdark.png
kingdark Posted February 14, 2006 Posted February 14, 2006 you sure? it would suprise me if you would not be able to train troops in the campaign http://miniprofile.xfire.com/bg/os/type/0/kingdark.png
Joebwan Posted February 14, 2006 Posted February 14, 2006 If the AT-AT wasn't moving the cable would eventually fall down to the ground like a pair of pants that are way too big with no belt. It was a Tow Cable so it wouldn't have any connectors along its length to hold it in place. This is essentially correct. The Airspeeder's "tow cable" is more properly called a "trip cable" in the context of attacking an AT-AT. If the AT-AT is stationary, it cannot be tripped by the cable and the cable will fall harmlessly to the ground. Petroglyph Lead DesignerLas Vegas. Nevada, USA
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now