DonBilbo Posted January 3, 2006 Share Posted January 3, 2006 Hi @all, today an editor from the magazine that brought the screenshot with the vanator sent me an email. Here's a translation for you: Originally written by Oliver Haake:I've asked one of our US editors: Lucasarts/Petroglyph says that the Venator Class Stardestroyer will be in the game. So the Screenshot shown in the PC Games 02/2006 is up to date. The shot doesn't show the tutorial or the first mission. The screenshot is made by Lucasarts, so it must be out from one of the later missions. So guys be happy....the Venator is officially in the game and so now all the discussions about the venator to be in or not to be in should be finished. greetzDonBilboHQ Network|Newsposterhttp://www.eawhq.de Empire at War HQ|Head AdminLegacy of War|Coder & Moderator http://outpost.cnc-hq.de/TRIALS/DonBilbo/Sonstiges/bilbosigvader2.jpghttp://outpost.cnc-hq.de/donbilbo/Sonstiges/low_sig1.jpg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cain Posted January 3, 2006 Share Posted January 3, 2006 Thanks - we appreciate it ... but I think we kind of knew that. Delphi said that the Venator is in MP and both factions can build it (something like that). So if you have an insider in the publishing area ask him pls. about other ships and stuff that we don't know about. A carrier for example. - The Trivium Organization - Community Manager -- Petroglyph Fan Forums - CoAdmin & Human Resources Manager - Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Little.B Posted January 3, 2006 Share Posted January 3, 2006 So if you have an insider in the publishing area ask him pls. about other ships and stuff that we don't know about. A carrier for example. At the Games Convention me and Junker talked to the Brand Manager of Activision Germany and if anything new is released it is published by/via Lucas Arts. Other sources are not allowed to published anything if they do not have the approval of LA. Even Activision, as the german publisher, is not allowed to reveal and even talk about content of the game that has not been revealed yet. If they do, they are in deeeeeeeep trouble... http://www.pexsus.com/~littleb/eaw/banner_eaw.jpgFeel the ForceIRC (QuakeNet): #empireatwar Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Star Wars Man Posted January 3, 2006 Share Posted January 3, 2006 Hi @all, today an editor from the magazine that brought the screenshot with the vanator sent me an email. So guys be happy....the Venator is officially in the game and so now all the discussions about the venator to be in or not to be in should be finished. greetzDonBilboHQ Network|Newsposterhttp://www.eawhq.de lol Strange that they took it off the list...oh, well. http://img525.imageshack.us/img525/3269/pffuserbar2globalmodnx9.jpg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popcorn2008 Posted January 3, 2006 Share Posted January 3, 2006 So if you have an insider in the publishing area ask him pls. about other ships and stuff that we don't know about. A carrier for example. At the Games Convention me and Junker talked to the Brand Manager of Activision Germany and if anything new is released it is published by/via Lucas Arts. Other sources are not allowed to published anything if they do not have the approval of LA. Even Activision, as the german publisher, is not allowed to reveal and even talk about content of the game that has not been revealed yet. If they do, they are in deeeeeeeep trouble...That's intereasting. I guess lucas arts has total control over what is published then. http://img525.imageshack.us/img525/3269/pffuserbar2globalmodnx9.jpg> Petroglyph Forums Moderator> LucasForums Moderator Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteSkull Posted January 3, 2006 Share Posted January 3, 2006 today an editor from the magazine that brought the screenshot with the vanator sent me an email. Since when did a editor for a mag become "offical", only LA reps or Devs can be "offical". And untill one of those 2 say it i wont buy it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Garbageben Posted January 3, 2006 Share Posted January 3, 2006 today an editor from the magazine that brought the screenshot with the vanator sent me an email. Since when did a editor for a mag become "offical", only LA reps or Devs can be "offical". And untill one of those 2 say it i wont buy it.Well if information is only released upon LA consent then the fact that the information was released means that it must be in line with what LA wants. That's confirmation enough for me. Yay it's in http://miniprofile.xfire.com/bg/sh/type/0/garbageben.png Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteSkull Posted January 3, 2006 Share Posted January 3, 2006 Well if information is only released upon LA consent then the fact that the information was released means that it must be in line with what LA wants. the info was not realsed is my point, what we have is one guy claiming someone sent him an email that has the info and he calls it offical. I am not saying the OP is lieing but it is possable the email was misread rumor or the editor is full of himself etc.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hadoken13 Posted January 3, 2006 Share Posted January 3, 2006 DELPHI ALREADY SAID IT WAS IN!!!!@white skullso this is confirmed twice!!!!whoooooootgood job guy who started this tread (i am not being sarcastic) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteSkull Posted January 3, 2006 Share Posted January 3, 2006 DELPHI ALREADY SAID IT WAS IN!!!!@white skull mind showing me the quote where he said that? Edit Unless your talking about this quote from the other thread. FYI, here is my revised quote from the other board. Easy, outdated tech. When you say Star Destroyer in our game, I think you are referring to an ISD or Victory. Also, that was more than likely taken during a MP game a while back. They were used by both sides in this mode. he says the SS was from awhile back, and even states they "were used" as in past tense so they could be ingame still or they could have been removed. Untill a Dev or LA pr guy says anything or its put in a mag as offical or a gamesite as offical and not sent as a 'email" i wont buy it. [/code] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hadoken13 Posted January 3, 2006 Share Posted January 3, 2006 FYI, here is my revised quote from the other board.Easy, outdated tech. When you say Star Destroyer in our game, I think you are referring to an ISD or Victory. Also, that[the venator] was more than likely taken during a MP game a while back. They were used by both sides in this mode.-delphi refering to the pic of the vanator attacking another venator in the latest screen shot-still looking for the other one...GOD delphi has alot of posts Delphi was kind enough to let us know that Venator's are going to be in the game. For those that may not know what class of star destroyer that is, it's those big dagger ships that were in the opening sequence in Episode 3.here be anotherDelphi: you're sure that what you're talking about is the Venator, and not the Acclamator? We will actually have two Clone Wars-era Star Destroyers? I'm sure since we have both. and another Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteSkull Posted January 3, 2006 Share Posted January 3, 2006 Joshinator wrote: Delphi was kind enough to let us know that Venator's are going to be in the game. For those that may not know what class of star destroyer that is, it's those big dagger ships that were in the opening sequence in Episode 3. hehe first that is not delphi saying that but again someone saying it for him. Delphi: you're sure that what you're talking about is the Venator, and not the Acclamator? We will actually have two Clone Wars-era Star Destroyers? I'm sure since we have both. Now thats more offical, but when was it posted? curious if its old or i am just blind and missed it lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AT-AP Posted January 4, 2006 Share Posted January 4, 2006 Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2005 7:30 pm In the game, will the Venator-class be used more as a fleet carrier or as a conventional "all-round" warship like the Imperial-class? It is a general warship. Keep in mind it is considered old tech, so SD's are far more powerful.That's Delphi's answer, in the same thread where he confirmed the Venator the first time. http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a242/CptK/StarCruiser.jpg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Juggernaut1985 Posted January 4, 2006 Share Posted January 4, 2006 This is funny becuase LEC Rogue just now stated it was cut. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grand Admiral Thrawn 889 Posted January 4, 2006 Share Posted January 4, 2006 Delphi has already Confirmed its in, in several Topic WHY? for the grace of God Would someone start ANOTHER ONE! http://i115.photobucket.com/albums/n292/Admiral_Antilles/Thrawncopy.jpghttp://img525.imageshack.us/img525/3269/pffuserbar2globalmodnx9.jpg I Support the Resistance! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teradyn_pff Posted January 4, 2006 Share Posted January 4, 2006 Left hand not knowing what right hand is doing? Sounds like LEC is making decisions (based on god only knows what) and Petroglyph is finding out about them later rather than being involved in them as they should be. My Death Star is bigger than your Death Star!"The XML is strong with this one!"http://miniprofile.xfire.com/bg/bg/type/0/teradyn.png Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteSkull Posted January 4, 2006 Share Posted January 4, 2006 Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2005 7:30 pm Quote: In the game, will the Venator-class be used more as a fleet carrier or as a conventional "all-round" warship like the Imperial-class? It is a general warship. Keep in mind it is considered old tech, so SD's are far more powerful. That's Delphi's answer, in the same thread where he confirmed the Venator the first time. Thats also around 3 months old and was said BEFORE they took the ven off the ship list on the site. Delphi has already Confirmed its in, in several Topic Whats funny is people keep saying this but have yet shot show a quote since it was cut from the ship list with him stating "yes its in" Edit [LEC] Rogue Total Posts: 177 Member Since: 02/05 Date Posted: Jan 04, 2006 10:24 AM REPLY The Venator was cut from EAW guys. [LEC] Rogue hmm unless rogue is lieing it sorta proves my point for me since everyone kept wanting to call the wrong thigns offical, what i just quoted is what is considers offical by most. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghostly_Substance Posted January 4, 2006 Share Posted January 4, 2006 http://img.gamespot.com/gamespot/images/2006/003/reviews/925180_20060104_screen001.jpg Also turning that Venator into my Avatar, looks so nice -One Empire falls another riseshttp://myanimelist.net/signature/EuroSubstance.png http://miniprofile.xfire.com/bg/os/type/2/ghostlysubstance.png Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grand Admiral Thrawn 889 Posted January 4, 2006 Share Posted January 4, 2006 yeah Ghostly that is kinda Conclusive proof that its in isnt it! http://i115.photobucket.com/albums/n292/Admiral_Antilles/Thrawncopy.jpghttp://img525.imageshack.us/img525/3269/pffuserbar2globalmodnx9.jpg I Support the Resistance! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteSkull Posted January 4, 2006 Share Posted January 4, 2006 yeah Ghostly that is kinda Conclusive proof that its in isnt it! its an old SS so it proves nothing since it was in at one time, we now have an offical person saying it was cut, and people are still trying to say its ingame lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hadoken13 Posted January 4, 2006 Share Posted January 4, 2006 i don't understand how people could doubt it!two pics proving it and 2 official sources proving that it is in... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deadeye31_pff Posted January 4, 2006 Share Posted January 4, 2006 Why take out the Venator? it happens to be the best design I've ever seen for a Star Destroyer. In fact, it's coolness surpasses even the ISD and SSD. It just looked to perfect for Episode 3. The guy who drew it deserves a bonus. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghostly_Substance Posted January 4, 2006 Share Posted January 4, 2006 well officially yes Sorry just got Venatory happy lol. Well common wouldn't hurt to have more proof right? Next update with Venators would be pointless lol. -One Empire falls another riseshttp://myanimelist.net/signature/EuroSubstance.png http://miniprofile.xfire.com/bg/os/type/2/ghostlysubstance.png Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteSkull Posted January 4, 2006 Share Posted January 4, 2006 i don't understand how people could doubt it! two pics proving it and 2 official sources proving that it is in... What 2 said its in since it was removed from the unit listings? One guy claiming a editor emailed him? lol thats not offical or proof even worse when it comes from someone with only 7 post. The 2nd seems to be a post from 3 months ago before they got cut. having any "offical" proof since then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hadoken13 Posted January 4, 2006 Share Posted January 4, 2006 i'm not gonna even bother bringing optimisim to this place anymoreit is killed too much Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts