Zer_Teron Posted December 24, 2005 Posted December 24, 2005 It used to be so good, but then Lucas stepped in and the game now SUCKS http://img20.imageshack.us/img20/3488/zersigef1.jpg
JanGaarni Posted December 25, 2005 Posted December 25, 2005 Lucas has nothing to do with this game. I suspect they wasn't able to balance the ship very well without changing it to something it's not. The number of fighter squadrons that ship is able to carry, and the fact Imperial fighters arn't taking up any pop cap, I believe they would have to scale down the amount of flight groups it can launch at once. http://www.lfnetwork.com/images/lfnlinker.gifStar Wars: Empire at War.Net Moderator&SWGalaxies Moderator Co-Leader of The Affiliates! -A-- What we do in life, echoes in eternity!- May the pants be with you!
AT-AP Posted December 25, 2005 Posted December 25, 2005 I don't understand why the Acclamator - a MUCH older ship - remains, while the Venator is axed.The Acclamator is a heavily armed troop transport, while the Acclamator II is like a heavy frigate. Both of these designs are used by the Empire due to not having any serious competitors filling in their niché, which might not be the case for the Venator. However, since its fighter-carrying capabilities exceed those of the Imperator and Victory, there could be a place for it as a heavily armed carrier. *Looks at previous posts*Whoops, there's that balancing issue... Still, having a dedicated carrier that can launch more fighters at a time, while more vulnerable than the Imperator would be fun. And probably balanced as well. http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a242/CptK/StarCruiser.jpg
Foshjedi2004 Posted December 25, 2005 Posted December 25, 2005 I don't understand why the Acclamator - a MUCH older ship - remains, while the Venator is axed. Why don't they just axe the useless Broadside Cruiser if they want to remove a ship model? No one gives a s*** about the fate of the Broadside. If this is indeed a prelude to a Clone Wars expansion, I refuse to buy that expansion out of principle. Games should be completed. Adding to ATAP The Acclamator was such a usefull Troop transport that the Imperial Armada kept the design in circulation for a long period of time. In fact even the post ROTJ fleets of the Cloned Emperor had many of the ships. http://i199.photobucket.com/albums/aa197/knivesdamaster/tags/sith_omguserbar_member.jpg
Avaris Posted December 25, 2005 Posted December 25, 2005 This is so frustrating if true. I recall it being used to quell the old SSD debate. "Well we are going for an earlier timeframe, so no SSD. But you will get the earlier ships like the Venator" :: sigh ::
Naja Posted December 26, 2005 Posted December 26, 2005 At least I can look to my fellow nerd heroes at Legacy of War, for my salvation. *salutes* Venators, Executors, and Lancers! Oh my!
Bryant_pff Posted December 26, 2005 Author Posted December 26, 2005 yeah, LoW wont have Venators, just IA2 Empire At War: NexusYour One Site for All your EaW modding needs!http://eawnexus.gamingsource.net/bannersandbuttons/nexussig.gif
Zer_Teron Posted December 26, 2005 Posted December 26, 2005 Lucas has nothing to do with this game. WRONG, Lucasarts has everything to do with this game. If Petro does one thing and Lucas tells them to desist, then they have to or get sued. Its probably why the Venator and all the good stuff was taken out http://img20.imageshack.us/img20/3488/zersigef1.jpg
noian Posted December 26, 2005 Posted December 26, 2005 If this is indeed a prelude to a Clone Wars expansion, I refuse to buy that expansion out of principle. Games should be completed.The need for a expansion might not exist with the mods that are already being developed.(you know technicly if all the mods combined it would be better than any expansion.) http://www.lucasforums.com/images/avatars/tiedefender.jpgMay the force be with you, always. http://homepage.ntlworld.com/susangillan/EDF-Avatar-X-Wing.jpg http://www.userbars.com/galerie/images/files/3/4/ffuser.jpghttp://www.pixelpwnage.com/sigs/grouptag.jpg.Check for Updates!...Imperial Assault II Mod for Empire at War!!.....Empire at War Nexus, Modding for a Galaxy Far Far Away!!!.......Use the Spell Check Feature People!!!!.........International Battlefront Clan!!!!!.....
JanGaarni Posted December 26, 2005 Posted December 26, 2005 Lucas has nothing to do with this game. WRONG, Lucasarts has everything to do with this game. If Petro does one thing and Lucas tells them to desist, then they have to or get sued. Its probably why the Venator and all the good stuff was taken outFirst of all, don't yell at me! Second of all, Lucas is not the same as LucasArts. Much the same way squadron isn't the same as squad (just to take a current example these days). http://www.lfnetwork.com/images/lfnlinker.gifStar Wars: Empire at War.Net Moderator&SWGalaxies Moderator Co-Leader of The Affiliates! -A-- What we do in life, echoes in eternity!- May the pants be with you!
HarkDawg Posted December 26, 2005 Posted December 26, 2005 would modding a SSD be difficult..... I want the Excecutor http://home.comcast.net/~danhanway/i7vpotatoes2.gif new sig btw; you deleted the good 1
Hadoken13 Posted December 26, 2005 Posted December 26, 2005 the ssd is already in the mods! didn't u notive people spamming the 'teaser pic' of it???-on topic!!!!!1-why do wo care? if it is out there must be a reason! the mods will put it in and if an expansion does first oh well i at least will wait for a mod to add this stuff cuz i am not payin for what the evil lucas minions took out
Nevets Posted December 27, 2005 Posted December 27, 2005 The need for a expansion might not exist with the mods that are already being developed.(you know technicly if all the mods combined it would be better than any expansion.) Delphi has said before, while they support mods they aren't as professional as the actual game, so that is why expansions are done (that and money... ) I will be kind of mad if they take out the venator (one of my fav ships) out for a marketing ploy.
Foshjedi2004 Posted December 27, 2005 Posted December 27, 2005 would modding a SSD be difficult..... I want the Executor Just for you Hawkdog http://i19.photobucket.com/albums/b191/Foshjedi2004/teaser.jpg http://i199.photobucket.com/albums/aa197/knivesdamaster/tags/sith_omguserbar_member.jpg
Naja Posted December 27, 2005 Posted December 27, 2005 Adding to ATAP The Acclamator was such a usefull Troop transport that the Imperial Armada kept the design in circulation for a long period of time. In fact even the post ROTJ fleets of the Cloned Emperor had many of the ships. I doubt that the devs have even read the Dark Empire series. Not that I'd blame 'em - those books are either loveable or detestable. But there was no concept of the Acclamator back then; those books were written in the early early 90's, way before the prequels. But anyway, the absence of the Venator with the unexplained remaining presence of the Acclamator would indeed be justifiable if the Acclamator were being used as an efficient troop transporter, like you said. It's not, however. Its use is just as a light frigate; that's all. Hence, my confusion at an Episode II starship being present in a game that spans from III-IV, paired with the absence of an Episode III starship. It was a very arbitrary decision that contradicted what we were told directly by Delphi.
AT-AP Posted December 27, 2005 Posted December 27, 2005 But there was no concept of the Acclamator back then; those books were written in the early early 90's, way before the prequels.That they were, but in a recent re-release one of the new covers had an Acclamator on it. But anyway, the absence of the Venator with the unexplained remaining presence of the Acclamator would indeed be justifiable if the Acclamator were being used as an efficient troop transporter, like you said. It's not, however. Its use is just as a light frigate; that's all. No, both main variants were used by the Empire, the dedicated warship seen in EAW (the Acclamator Mk. II) and the Acclamator Mk. I transport (seen in SW Empire issues 30-34 and 36). In DE I issue 1, there's a Venator-ish ship in orbit around Byss. It has an elongated rear going far behind the command tower, but otherwise resembles a Venator. Funny coincidence. http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a242/CptK/StarCruiser.jpg
Cain Posted December 29, 2005 Posted December 29, 2005 I don't think they can remove the Venators and keep the Aclamators it will be strange and funny. As for LEC people - they are young and they do try their best. They are still doing a lot of modifications inside the game for better balance so if the Venator is unbalanceing the game give the Rebels another ship to counter it. I do hope that the 50 extra models that were disabled are in the games files ready to be enabled by moders. This Venator / Aclamator issue its the same like the one with the shields and they did modified 85% vof the maps to put the generators inside. So maybe in the end we will have the best solution availeble. - The Trivium Organization - Community Manager -- Petroglyph Fan Forums - CoAdmin & Human Resources Manager -
Grand Admiral Thrawn 889 Posted December 29, 2005 Posted December 29, 2005 so Cain what Sgip do you suggest they give the Rebels that can Counter Balance the Venator? http://i115.photobucket.com/albums/n292/Admiral_Antilles/Thrawncopy.jpghttp://img525.imageshack.us/img525/3269/pffuserbar2globalmodnx9.jpg I Support the Resistance!
Garbageben Posted December 29, 2005 Posted December 29, 2005 so Cain what Sgip do you suggest they give the Rebels that can Counter Balance the Venator?The fleet carriers they had. Can't remember the actual designation, but I remember one was the Flurry. That would work if the Venator were a carrier, but since Delphi said it was an all-arounder then I'd say the Assault Frigate MK1. http://miniprofile.xfire.com/bg/sh/type/0/garbageben.png
Grand Admiral Thrawn 889 Posted December 29, 2005 Posted December 29, 2005 Junker has found a screenshot with the Venator in it so it confirms that the Venator is in the game. http://swempireatwar.10.forumer.com/viewtopic.php?p=27156#27156 http://i115.photobucket.com/albums/n292/Admiral_Antilles/Thrawncopy.jpghttp://img525.imageshack.us/img525/3269/pffuserbar2globalmodnx9.jpg I Support the Resistance!
Foshjedi2004 Posted December 29, 2005 Posted December 29, 2005 http://www.sw-eaw.de/galerie/org/404.jpg http://i199.photobucket.com/albums/aa197/knivesdamaster/tags/sith_omguserbar_member.jpg
Stellar_Magic Posted December 29, 2005 Posted December 29, 2005 Well, it depends on how the Venator works in game as to what vessel should have been brought in to balance it out. If the Venator acts as a fleet carrier there are a number of choices available:Quasar Fire Class Bulk Cruiser (Examples of this class include the Flurry)Escort Carrier (Used by both the Rebels and Empire, examples include the Hydra from XvT Balance of Power) If the Venator acts as a heavy frigate capable of launching a limited number of starfighters an even wider variety of options appears:MC 40 Lusla ClassRendili Star Drive DreadnaughtRendili Star Drive Bulk CruiserInvinvible Class Dreadnaught Forum and RPG Membership:http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v436/StellarMagic01/RaporaWarsTC.jpghttp://img.photobucket.com/albums/v436/StellarMagic01/RaporaWarsRPG2.jpg Signature:Sufficiently advanced technology would be indistinguishable from Magic. -Arthur C. Clarke
Grand Admiral Thrawn 889 Posted December 29, 2005 Posted December 29, 2005 i think that the Rendili class would be the better class to balance it out as it is from that Era. and it has an Equal amount of weapons. http://i115.photobucket.com/albums/n292/Admiral_Antilles/Thrawncopy.jpghttp://img525.imageshack.us/img525/3269/pffuserbar2globalmodnx9.jpg I Support the Resistance!
Gen.Vader Posted December 29, 2005 Posted December 29, 2005 see lower center ISD is that thing still functional?? it looks like a rancor chewed from both ends but stopped at the midpoint coolies! I've have you now - Lord Vader
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now